釋禪波羅蜜次第法門 1.162
English (machine translation) 1.162
- Language
- English
1.162
Furthermore, if defiled dharmas are arising, do they arise because arising arises, because non-arising arises, because arising and non-arising arise, or because neither arising nor non-arising arises? If arising arises, that is arising from intrinsic nature; if non-arising arises, that is arising from extrinsic nature; if they arise because arising and non-arising arise, that is shared arising; if they arise because neither arising nor non-arising arises, that is arising without causes and conditions. When arising from causes and conditions is already untenable, how much less could there be arising without causes and conditions? Thus, seeking the arising of defiled dharmas within relativistic nominality is ultimately unattainable. If there is no arising, then there is no defiled [dharma]. The refutation of relativistic nominality is explained at length as in the *Zhiguan*. Defiled mind is also like this, and the remaining three kinds of dharma-mind are also like this.
Linked texts (1)
- 釋禪波羅蜜次第法門 — Classical Chinese