四教義 3.7
English (machine translation) 3.7
- Language
- English
3.7
Second, directly explaining entering principle through the four gates: As for the four gates of the non-Buddhists, their mental practice is outside principle, and their inverted thoughts correspond with inverted principles, so they cannot enter the principle of true nature. Why is this? Because according to the differences in their minds, the principles they see also differ; therefore they each say, 'I claim to have attained the one ultimate path,' giving rise to disputes as a result. Now, we explain that the four gates of the Buddha's Dharma can all enter the one principle, yet there are two kinds of differences: first, the two kinds of four gates of the Tripiṭaka and shared teachings together enter the principle of biased truth; second, the two kinds of four gates of the distinctive and perfect teachings together enter the principle of perfect truth. First, explaining that the four gates of the Tripiṭaka and the four gates of the shared teaching together enter the principle of biased truth: because of their respective four gates, they together enter the biased true paramārtha and attain the two kinds of nirvāṇa; in this they are identical. Although the principle is one, the gates differ: since there is the difference between the two conveyances of clumsy and skillful, there are distinctions in the capacity of the two kinds of four gates to provide passage. Because the true principle is non-dual, the ultimate principle to which they provide passage is one. For example, a provincial city opens four gates; the commissioner is one, yet those who enter from the four gates find that although the gates differ, the commissioner they see is only one. The four gates of the Tripiṭaka teaching are like entering from the four peripheral side gates of the provincial city; the four gates of the shared teaching are like entering from the four main gates. Although side and main differ, entering to see the biased true paramārtha-satya and attaining the two kinds of nirvāṇa are identical. Second, explaining that the four gates of the distinctive teaching and the four gates of the perfect teaching together enter the principle of the middle way, real mark, and true nature: entering respectively through their four gates, seeing the Buddha-nature of the real mark, and attaining the permanently joyful nirvāṇa are identical. Although the principle is identical, the gates differ. Since the gates of teaching have the distinction of biased and perfect, there are differences in the capacity of the two kinds of four gates to provide passage. Because Buddha-nature and the true principle are non-dual, the principle of true nature to which they provide passage is one. For example, the palace citadel has four gates; although the gates are not the same, the Son of Heaven who is seen is one. The four gates of the distinctive teaching are like entering from the four peripheral side gates of the palace citadel; the four gates of the perfect teaching are like entering from the four main gates. Although side and main differ, entering to see the principle of true nature, liberation, and real mark is identical.
Linked texts (1)
- 四教義 — Classical Chinese