法智遺編觀心二百問 1.170

1.170

問：若合三智之解為了，三脫之行為緣，顯發性三為正，如此約開論合有何等過？那得枉云開則三觀、合則空假耶？

Question: If combining the understanding of the three wisdoms serves as the revealing [cause], and the practice of the three liberations serves as the auxiliary [cause], directly manifesting the innate three as the primary [cause]—what fault is there in thus discussing combination with respect to opening? How could you falsely claim that opening is the three contemplations and combination is emptiness and provisionality?