法智遺編觀心二百問 1.201

1.201

問：仁元執云「此玄所談十法純是理觀，直顯心性超過《妙玄》，故廢附法觀心」，今何全同《法界次第》列諸法數，却是學三觀者自用觀法融之，則成此玄全不談理觀、全不顯心性，乃自《發揮》至今義狀，所說一時傾敗，此文觀心自成真說。

Question: You originally clung to the claim: 'The ten dharmas discussed in this Xuan are purely the contemplation of principle, directly revealing the mind-nature and surpassing the Miaoxuan, therefore discarding the contemplation of mind attached to dharmas.' Now, why is it completely identical to the Fajie cidi in listing various doctrinal enumerations, which those studying the three contemplations must fuse for themselves by applying contemplative methods? That being so, this Xuan does not discuss the contemplation of principle at all, and does not reveal the mind-nature at all; thus, from the Fahui down to your current doctrinal petition, everything you have said collapses at once, and the contemplation of mind in this text naturally becomes the true exposition.