法智遺編觀心二百問 1.57

1.57

問：所云「以諸文中直云境智」者，蓋以諸文既對陰不便，故輟陰名，而但以一念心及因緣生心等為境，以三觀為智，即是直云境智也。若不爾者，有何觀解但立境、智兩字耶？

Question: As for stating, 'Because the various texts directly speak of object and wisdom'—this is merely because, the various texts not finding it convenient to correlate with the skandhas, they dispense with the name of 'skandha' and simply take the single thought-moment of mind and the mind born of causes and conditions as the object, and take the three contemplations as wisdom; this is what is meant by 'directly speaking of object and wisdom'. If this were not so, what contemplative understanding would merely establish the two words 'object' and 'wisdom'?