四明十義書 1.209

1.209

上人既被詰難書將前後文驗之，顯是素來不知二造之義。灼然前書攀附正義，云理具三千實非事造。其過既大。又恐若順《輔行》分於二造，若順不二門分於二境，則《示珠指》及《辨訛》前後之文全然不當。故於今來還拋正義、却復邪宗，仍將事造便為理具，遂不分二造及以二境，乃令事理內外混沌而觀。此說全無所以，特違教文。

Once you, Reverend Sir, were confronted by the Letter of Cross-examination comparing the earlier and later passages, it was clearly shown that you have never understood the meaning of the two makings. It was obvious that in your earlier letter you latched onto the correct doctrine, saying that the three thousand inherently possessed in principle are truly not phenomenal making. Your error was already great. Furthermore, you feared that if you followed the Fuxing in distinguishing the two makings, and followed the Gate of Non-duality in distinguishing the two objects, then the earlier and later texts of your Shizhu zhi and Bian'e would be entirely inappropriate. Therefore, now you once again discard the correct doctrine and return to the heterodox school, still taking phenomenal making to be inherent possession in principle; consequently, failing to distinguish the two makings as well as the two objects, you cause phenomena and principle, internal and external, to be contemplated in chaos. This explanation is completely groundless and especially contradicts the scriptural texts.