四明十義書 1.42

1.42

上人此立不同，記主引例令同，是則不同之義又壞也。故覆問書，具引此文為難。上人不知慚愧，唯知轉計，但得一句少分略存，則便怒張抵拒。

The Venerable established that these are not the same, while the subcommentator cited an analogy to make them the same; thus his thesis that they are not the same is ruined once again. Therefore, the *Letter of Re-inquiry* fully cited this passage to refute him. The Venerable knows no shame and only knows how to shift his claims: if he can retain just a fraction of a single phrase, he bristles with anger and resists.