四明十義書 2.168

2.168

然雖作此說，亦自知無義，復就教理論其境觀。且一切教部，何處不得名教詮於法理，豈可皆是依境明觀？

Yet although you made this assertion, you yourself realized it was groundless, and again discussed object and contemplation in terms of teaching and principle. Now, throughout all divisions of the teachings, where does the teaching not express dharma and principle? Could all of them possibly be clarifying contemplation by relying on the object?