四明十義書 2.173

2.173

理極之後，又轉執云：諸文雖有即說無說，既無修性因果，故無觀心之義。此文該於修性因果，故具觀心義者。

Having reached the limit of your reasoning, you shifted your attachment again, claiming: although various texts have 'saying is identical to non-saying', since they lack cultivation and nature, cause and fruit, they lack the meaning of contemplating the mind; whereas this text encompasses cultivation and nature, cause and fruit, and therefore possesses the meaning of contemplating the mind.