四明十義書 2.201

2.201

蓋承上人以真性釋心故，予昨為防此計，故引《義例》理觀唯達法性之文示之。豈非彼文雖不云達於陰心，理觀既當端坐十乘，豈不達陰識為法性耶？

Because the Superior interpreted 'mind' as true nature, I previously cited the passage from the Yili stating that 'principle contemplation solely penetrates the dharmatā' in order to guard against this reckoning. Is it not the case that, although that text does not speak of penetrating the mind of the aggregates, since principle contemplation corresponds to the sitting upright [contemplation using] the ten vehicles, how could it not penetrate the consciousness of the aggregates as dharmatā?