四明十義書 2.96

2.96

且唯觀妄心，因誰得解？是誰不許？只如《發揮》至前諸義狀，何文云唯觀妄心？況自將圓談法性便當觀心，自將果證之理便為理觀及名直顯心性，自解塵塵法界處處遮那便能入理證果。尚將外境依正難於簡色觀心，此等諸說豈知初心唯觀妄念耶？

Furthermore, from whom was the understanding of contemplating solely the deluded mind derived? Who does not allow it? In your Fahui down to your previous statements of doctrine, which passage said to contemplate solely the deluded mind? What is more, you personally took the perfect exposition of dharmatā to be contemplating the mind itself; you personally took the principle realized at the fruit [of Buddhahood] to be principle contemplation itself and called it directly revealing the mind-nature; you personally construed that 'every dust mote is the dharma realm, and in every place is Vairocana' would enable one to enter the principle and realize the fruit. You even used external objects, the dependent and primary [rewards], to challenge the selection of form and contemplation of mind. How could such statements recognize that beginners contemplate solely the deluded thought?