四明尊者教行錄 3.146

3.146

四十二問：《止觀》云：以觀觀昏，即昏而朗；以止止散，即散而寂。荊溪對釋此二句云：照此昏體，一觀而三名，即昏而朗。寂此散體，三止而一名，即散而寂。且一觀昏耶？三止散耶？三觀朗耶？一止寂耶？不然，何以對釋云即昏而朗、即散而寂耶？

Forty-second Question: The Zhiguan states: 'By contemplating with contemplation, dullness becomes bright in dullness itself; by calming with calming, distraction becomes quiescent in distraction itself.' Jingxi comments in correlation with these two lines: 'Illuminating this substance of dullness, it is one contemplation with three names, becoming bright in dullness itself; quieting this substance of distraction, it is three calmings with one name, becoming quiescent in distraction itself.' Now, is one contemplation dullness? Are three calmings distraction? Are three contemplations brightness? Is one calming quiescence? If not, why does the commentary correlate them by saying 'becoming bright in dullness itself' and 'becoming quiescent in distraction itself'?