大慧普覺禪師語錄 24.14

24.14

昔靈雲和尚因見桃華，忽然悟道，有偈曰：「三十年來尋劍客，幾回葉落又抽枝，自從一見桃花後，直至如今更不疑。」溈山和尚詰其所悟，與之符契，乃印可曰：「從緣悟達，永無退失。」又雪峯和尚自作壽塔銘，序曰：「夫從緣有者，始終而成壞，非從緣得者，歷劫而常堅。」此二尊宿所見，且道是一般是兩般？若道是一般，一人以從緣而得為是，一人以從緣而得為非；若道兩般，不可二大老各立門戶疑惑後人。（咦）鵝王擇乳素非鴨類，知立禪人還知二大老落處麼？若不知，雲門直為爾說破。二由一有，一亦莫守，一心不生，萬法無咎。已上兩段不同，收歸上科○（咄）！

In the past, Master Lingyun suddenly awakened to the Way upon seeing peach blossoms, and had a verse: / 'For thirty years a sword-seeking guest, / How many times leaves fell and branches sprouted again! / Ever since seeing the peach blossoms once, / Right up to now I have doubted no more.' / Master Guishan questioned what he had awakened to, and it tallied with his own realization, so he gave his seal of approval, saying, 'Awakened and penetrated through conditions, one never regresses.' Also, Master Xuefeng composed the inscription for his own stūpa, the preface of which states: 'What exists through conditions is produced and destroyed from beginning to end; what is not attained through conditions remains forever solid throughout the kalpas.' As for what these two venerable elders saw, tell me: is it one and the same, or is it two different things? If you say it is one and the same, one considered attainment through conditions to be right, while the other considered attainment through conditions to be wrong. If you say they are two different things, the two great elders could not have each established their own sectarian gates to confuse later people. (Bah!) The goose king sorting milk from water is fundamentally not of the duck's kind. Chan practitioner Zhili, do you know the resting place of these two great elders? If not, Yunmen will directly lay it bare for you: / 'The two arise from the one, / But do not cling to the one either; / When not a single mind arises, / The myriad dharmas are without fault.' / The two passages above are not the same; subsume them under the previous heading. [He draws a circle] (Phat!)