宗鏡錄 34.4
English (machine translation) 34.4
- Language
- English
34.4
Question: Since the sūtra says, 'Seeing conditioned processes as impermanent is an annihilationist view, not a right view; seeing nirvāṇa as permanent is an eternalist view, not a right view', why is it that in the teaching it is sometimes said there is no self, and sometimes said there is a self? Is this not contradictory?
Linked texts (1)
- 宗鏡錄 — Classical Chinese