宗鏡錄 62.19
English (machine translation) 62.19
- Language
- English
62.19
Answer: What is disputed now takes only the archetype of the sense-object of matter as not directly cognized by the eye. Distinguishing them from one another conforms with oneself and contradicts the other, properly constituting the substance of the thesis. Because, although the Hīnayāna accepts that the archetype of matter is separate from visual consciousness, it nonetheless maintains that it is directly cognized. Now stating that it is not directly cognized, how is this not a dispute over the thesis?
Linked texts (1)
- 宗鏡錄 — Classical Chinese