佛祖統紀 43.47

43.47

The author remarks: Since antiquity, when rulers revered the virtue of śramaṇas, they invariably dignified their positions and distinguished their titles, calling them Monastic Registrars, Monastic Directors, Dharma Masters, or National Preceptors. When entering for an audience they did not refer to themselves as ministers, and when ascending the hall they were granted elevated seats. In this manner propriety was maintained. But as for conferring official ranks, adding noble titles, and styling them ministers or dukes, this mixes them inappropriately into the court hierarchy and easily invites public criticism. Above, it forfeits the decorum of honoring monastics; below, it leaves them open to the reproach of abandoning integrity. The pure style of the Śākya clan thus almost fails to contend [with the world]. Even those summoned scholars and recluses who refuse to serve princes and lords—how can our fellowship feel no shame before them? If Amoghavajra opened an office during the Tang dynasty, and Tianxizai was made Minister of Imperial Entertainments in our Song, it was entirely because their translation merits were great and they specifically received imperial grace. This was merely meant to repay the ruler's reverence for the Dharma, not something to be taken as personal glory.