廬山記 5.114

5.114

高山寺藏本廬山記五卷。卷二三宋槧本。餘三卷舊鈔補。然於宋諱皆闕筆。蓋亦從宋本出也。書中避諱諸字至高宗諱栴字止。而光宗之嫌名敦字則不闕筆。蓋刊於高光間也。此書我國守山閣叢書刊四庫本但存前三篇為一卷。館臣謂佚第四五篇。今宋槧實為篇八為卷五。第一二篇為卷一。第三篇為卷二。第四五篇為卷三。第六篇為卷四。第七八篇為卷五。守山閣本不但佚第四篇以下。其分卷亦非當時之舊矣。館臣見今本篇為一卷。遂疑佚者僅四五兩篇。抑又誤矣。此書全本不知何時佚去太半。館臣謂永樂大典本亦僅三篇。則明初已。佚東邦刊本。於宋槧外。尚有元祿十年刊本均完足。今取元祿守山二刻。與宋本比勘。知元祿本雖完亦有譌奪。守山閣本則譌脫彌甚。第一篇守山本奪釋慧遠廬山記。略至略舉其異耳數十行（元祿本未奪）第二篇影圖者以下。元祿本錯簡十餘行（守山本不誤）而遠公記云至已上蓋述石門之勝十餘行。又遠公上記云至謂阿羅漢之類也三行。守山本並奪佚。第三篇守山本奪昔東海僧邈云云十三字。又奪源由福云云二十八字。第六篇元祿本奪落星寺詩半葉。第七篇元祿本敘東林寺諸碑誤錯。列東林寺經藏碑銘及大德粲公碑銘。於慧遠法師等三碑之前。知元祿本已不能無失矣。此本卷一闕第二葉卷四闕第二十一及第二十八兩葉。又卷一李常序書縫寫第三葉。則此上當有兩葉亦佚。今卷一第二葉據元祿本補之。其他諸葉則元祿本亦闕。怨世遂無他本可據補矣。予夙愛此書。敘述雅贍。似水徑清苔。未見足本。宣統紀元。客游東京。忽遘此宋槧於德富氏成簣堂文庫。大喜過望。久念之不去懷。去年冬乃迻書從蘇峯翁假印既得請。乃書宋槧本之可貴者於卷尾。尚不僅在無佚卷已也。宣統丁巳正月。永豐鄉人羅振云書於東山寓居之四時嘉至軒。

The Kōzanji edition of the five-fascicle Lushan ji: fascicles two and three are Song woodblock printings, while the remaining three fascicles are supplied from old hand-copies. However, for Song imperial taboos, strokes are omitted in all of them, so they must also derive from a Song edition. In the text, the tabooed characters end with the tabooed name of Emperor Gaozong, Zhan (栴), whereas Dun (敦), the similar-sounding name of Emperor Guangzong, does not omit strokes. It was likely printed between the reigns of Gaozong and Guangzong. In our country, the Shoushangel congshu edition, which printed the Siku [quanshu] text of this book, preserves only the first three chapters as one fascicle; the [Siku] editors stated that the fourth and fifth chapters were lost. Now the Song woodblock edition in fact has eight chapters in five fascicles: the first and second chapters form fascicle one; the third chapter forms fascicle two; the fourth and fifth chapters form fascicle three; the sixth chapter forms fascicle four; and the seventh and eighth chapters form fascicle five. The Shoushangel edition not only lost everything from the fourth chapter onwards, but its division into fascicles was also not the original arrangement of that time. The editors, seeing that in the present edition each chapter forms one fascicle, consequently suspected that the lost ones were only the fourth and fifth chapters, which was yet another error. It is unknown when more than half of the complete edition of this book was lost; the editors stated that the Yongle dadian edition also had only three chapters, so it was already lost by the early Ming. As for the editions printed in the Eastern Realm [Japan], besides the Song woodblock printing, there is also an edition printed in the tenth year of Genroku, both of which are complete. Now, comparing the two printings of Genroku and Shoushange against the Song edition, one knows that although the Genroku edition is complete, it also has errors and omissions, whereas the Shoushangel edition has even worse errors and lacunae. In the first chapter, the Shoushange edition omits several tens of lines from Master Huiyuan's 'Lushan ji lüe' down to 'lueju qiyi er' (not omitted in the Genroku edition). In the second chapter, from 'yingtu zhe' onwards, the Genroku edition has transposed slips of over ten lines (not erroneous in the Shoushange edition); but from 'Yuangong ji yun' down to 'yishang gai shu Shimen zhi sheng' (over ten lines), and from 'Yuangong shangji yun' down to 'wei aluohan zhi lei ye' (three lines), both are lost and omitted in the Shoushange edition. In the third chapter, the Shoushange edition omits thirteen characters from 'Xi Donghai seng Miao yunyun', and another twenty-eight characters from 'yuan you fu yunyun'. In the sixth chapter, the Genroku edition omits half a leaf of poems on Luoxing Temple. In the seventh chapter, the Genroku edition's account of the various stelae at Donglin Temple contains errors, placing the inscription on the scripture library of Donglin Temple and the stele inscription for the Bhadanta Master Can before the three stelae for Master Huiyuan and others; thus one knows that the Genroku edition is indeed not without faults. In this edition, the second leaf of fascicle one is missing, and the twenty-first and twenty-eighth leaves of fascicle four are missing. Furthermore, in fascicle one, the margin of Li Chang's preface is marked 'third leaf', which indicates that two leaves before this must also be lost. Now the second leaf of fascicle one has been supplemented according to the Genroku edition; as for the other leaves, the Genroku edition also lacks them, and it is regrettable that there is no other edition in the world to rely upon for supplementation. I have long loved this book, whose narrative is elegant and rich, like clear moss in a mountain stream, but had never seen a complete copy. In the first year of Xuantong, while traveling in Tokyo, I suddenly came across this Song woodblock edition in Mr. Tokutomi's Seikitō Bunko. I was overjoyed beyond measure and could not put it out of my mind for a long time. In the winter of last year, I sent a letter to Master Sohō to borrow it for printing, and having obtained permission, I have inscribed the precious value of this Song woodblock edition at the end of the scroll, which indeed lies not merely in having no lost fascicles. In the first month of the dingsi year of Xuantong, Luo Zhenyu, a native of Yongfeng, wrote this at the Sishi Jiazhi Xuan of his temporary residence in Higashiyama.