集沙門不應拜俗等事 4.24

4.24

We humbly consider: The two teachings of Śākya and Lao possess vast and profound compassion and reverence. Rulers of states have followed them through the ages and opened the way for honoring them. Since their methods have long endured, one must comply with their Way. We privately deem that making them bow and prostrate would, in principle, not be acceptable. Why so? Shaving the hair differs from the attire of caps and sashes; holding the bowl is hardly the etiquette of wine-goblets and sacrificial stands. When expressing gratitude, they pray for meditation and wisdom without need of toil; by bowing and kneeling to stern parents, they hope to repay their virtue. Why must tathatā bend its waist to a benevolent empress? Having departed for the mountains and forests, they are no longer guests of the palace halls; the court and the wilderness are strictly distinct, and in principle it is fitting for them to hold their pursuit aloft. Now, to hold them accountable to the Teaching of Names would compromise their purpose. We, your ministers, in our foolishness and ignorance, request that following the practice of not bowing be deemed proper. Respectfully deliberated.