Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

破邪論 2.10

English (machine translation) 2.10

Language
English

2.10

In response, it is said: We observe that Confucius was born in the time of King Ling of Zhou and died in the time of King Jing. Calculating his life, it was over seventy years. Since he was a sage, he surely could have assisted the rulers of his day. Why is it that in fourteen years he traveled through seventy states, had the tree felled over him in Song, had his traces obliterated in Wei, ran out of provisions in Chen and Cai, fled the murderous intent of Huan Tui, and was ashamed at being called a stray dog? Although he was engaged by the feudal lords, none could employ him. In the era of the Spring and Autumn, the way of Wen and Wu had fallen into decline; rulers were unenlightened, ministers treacherous, and propriety and music ruined. At that time there was no Buddha; why then were rebellions and chaos all the more rampant, and usurpations and regicides constantly arising? Confucius was gentle and yielded to the times, hesitating and evading perils, and could hardly protect his wife and children. Even living to a hundred years would have been of no avail. He spoke of being like an uneaten bitter gourd and sighed over the flowing river. Yet he still used humble words to the Ji lineage, and grieved that the phoenix did not come and the Yellow River did not bring forth the chart. When in the western hunt the qilin was captured, he turned his sleeves to wipe his face and declared, 'My way has come to an end!' Although he had three thousand disciples, edited the *Odes*, and determined the *Rites*, he still worried that he would die and his name would not be praised: 'How shall I be seen by later generations?' He suffered the humiliation of Robber Zhi and received the mockery of the old recluse. Evaluating this, it is plenty evident! If this is deemed of no benefit to the world, the two sages Kong and Lao also suffered from this. Why then be mute like wood and stone, offering no impeachment against them? Furthermore, to the claim that where monasteries abound with monastic gatherings, monstrous wickedness inevitably arises, just as with the śramaṇa Zhang Guang of the Later Zhao, the śramaṇa Fachang of the Later Yan, Daomi of the Southern Liang, Faxiu during the reign of Emperor Xiaowen of the Wei, and Huiyang during the Taihe era, all of whom revolted:

Linked texts (1)