開元釋教錄 17.12

17.12

菩薩地持經十卷（或八卷亦名菩薩戒經又名菩薩地經）
右一經。亦名菩薩地持論。今此錄中編之
為律。存其經名除其論錄。周錄中云。菩薩
地持經闕本者誤也。又周錄中此一本經
既有多名。前後差互凡六處重上錯之甚
也（大乘經中一處上大乘律中二處上大乘論中一處上闕本錄中二處上）。
餘經重載其數非一。恐繁紙墨故略述之。
無畏德女經一卷（今編入寶積）
第一義法勝經一卷
彌勒菩薩所問本願經一卷
右三經。大周入藏錄中單本重譯二處俱
載者誤也。今除單本編重譯中。
發菩提心經二卷（亦名發菩提心論）
右一經。周入藏錄大乘經中及大乘論二
處俱載者誤也。今以菩薩所造除其經名
存於論錄。
諫王經一卷（亦名大小諫王經）
右一經周入藏闕本二錄俱載者誤也。
法句經二卷（亦云法句集）
右一經。周入藏錄大乘重譯及集傳內二
處俱載者誤也。尋文並同不可分二。雖曾
再譯一本闕無。今經中除編於集內。
攝大乘釋論十二卷
右一論。隋開皇仁壽中眾經錄及唐內典
大周錄等皆存二本。云與十五卷攝論同
本異出俱是陳朝三藏真諦所譯者誤也。
今勘文句首末全同。卷雖多少有殊不可
分為二部。但存十五卷本。十二成者除之。

*Pusa dichi jing*, ten fascicles (or eight fascicles; also titled *Pusa jie jing*, and also titled *Pusa di jing*).
The one sūtra above is also titled *Pusa dichi lun*. In this catalogue it is now compiled as vinaya, preserving its sūtra title and deleting its entry under śāstras. The Zhou catalogue states that the *Pusa dichi jing* is a lost text, which is an error. Furthermore, because this single sūtra has many titles, the Zhou catalogue is contradictory from beginning to end, entering it repeatedly in six places altogether, which is a gross error (entered once among Mahāyāna sūtras, entered twice among Mahāyāna vinaya, entered once among Mahāyāna śāstras, and entered twice in the catalogue of lost texts).
Other sūtras that were repeatedly listed are more than one; fearing to waste paper and ink, I give only a brief account.
*Wuwei de nü jing*, one fascicle (now compiled into the *Ratnakūṭa*).
*Diyi yi fasheng jing*, one fascicle.
*Mile pusa suowen benyuan jing*, one fascicle.
Regarding the three sūtras above, that the *Da Zhou ruzang lu* listed them in both places—under single translations and under retranslations—was an error. I have now deleted them from the single translations and compiled them among the retranslations.
*Fa putixin jing*, two fascicles (also titled *Fa putixin lun*).
Regarding the one sūtra above, that the Zhou canon catalogue listed it in both places—among Mahāyāna sūtras and among Mahāyāna śāstras—was an error. Now, because it was composed by a bodhisattva, I have deleted its title as a sūtra and preserved it in the catalogue of śāstras.
*Jian wang jing*, one fascicle (also titled *Daxiao jian wang jing*).
Regarding the one sūtra above, that the Zhou canon catalogue and catalogue of lost texts both listed it was an error.
*Faju jing*, two fascicles (also called *Faju ji*).
Regarding the one sūtra above, that the Zhou canon catalogue listed it in two places—under Mahāyāna retranslations and within the compilations and biographies—was an error. Examining their texts, they are entirely identical and cannot be split into two. Although it was once retranslated, one translation is lost and missing. It is now deleted from the sūtras and compiled within the compilations.
*She dacheng shi lun*, twelve fascicles.
Regarding the one śāstra above, the catalogues of the Kaihuang and Renshou eras of the Sui, as well as the Tang *Neidian lu* and *Da Zhou lu*, all preserve two versions, stating that it is a different translation of the same original as the fifteen-fascicle *She lun*, and that both were translated by Paramārtha, Tripiṭaka master of the Chen dynasty, which is an error. Now collating the phrasing, beginning and end are completely identical. Although the fascicles differ in quantity, they cannot be split into two works. Only the fifteen-fascicle text is preserved, and the twelve-fascicle creation is deleted.