開元釋教錄 15.11

15.11

Prātimokṣa of the Mahāsāṃghika, one fascicle, translated by the śramaṇa Dharmakāla of Tianzhu under the Cao Wei
(First translation)
The above has had two translations; one text is extant in the canon and one is lost.
Bhikṣu-prātimokṣa of the Sarvāstivāda, one fascicle (also called Mahābhikṣu-prātimokṣa of the Sarvāstivāda), translated by the Western Regions śramaṇa Dharmadhara together with Zhu Fonian under the Fu Qin (First translation)
Bhikṣu-prātimokṣa of the Sarvāstivāda, one fascicle, compiled and produced by the Western Regions śramaṇa Zhu Tanwulan under the Eastern Jin (Second translation; the Changfang Catalogue says: In the sixth year of Taiyuan, Tanwulan combined the three versions of Sengchun, Dharmadhara, and Zhu Sengshu into one fascicle. See the Baochang Catalogue. Checking the various catalogues carefully: Sengchun obtained the Sanskrit text of the Sarvāstivāda Bhikṣuṇī-prātimokṣa in Kucha and brought it back, having Dharmadhara and others translate it out. Only this Sengchun and Dharmadhara are the same text; Zhu Sengshu has no name in the various catalogues, and it is unknown where the combined version came from, its rationale being unclear)
Including the combined text, the above has had three translations; one is extant and two are lost.
Bhikṣuṇī-śīla, one fascicle (also called Bhikṣuṇī-prātimokṣa Sūtra, extracted from the Sarvāstivāda-vinaya), translated by the Tripiṭaka master Dharmarakṣa under the Western Jin (First translation)
Great Bhikṣuṇī-śīla, one fascicle (also called Sarvāstivāda Bhikṣuṇī-śīla), translated by the Western Regions śramaṇa Dharmadhara together with Fonian and others under the Fu Qin (Second translation)
Origin and Development of the Sarvāstivāda Bhikṣuṇī-śīla, one fascicle, translated by the Liangzhou śramaṇa Zhu Fonian under the Yao Qin (Third translation)
(The Changfang Catalogue says: Sengchun obtained the Sanskrit text in Kucha, and Fonian translated it for him. The text was prolix, and later Zhu Fatai abridged and corrected it; see the Baochang Catalogue. I now suspect that Fonian's translation was the same Bhikṣuṇī-śīla text as Dharmadhara's; what difference was there in its origin that it was preserved separately?)
The above three translations are all lost.
Mahīśāsaka-karman, one fascicle (extracted from the Mahīśāsaka-vinaya), translated by the Kashmir Tripiṭaka master Buddhajīva and others under the Song (Sole translation)
Extract of the Mahīśāsaka-vinaya, one fascicle, translated by the Siṃhala śramaṇa Saṅghavarman (Date unknown; listed in the Baochang Catalogue; sole translation, appended to the Song)
Kāśyapa-śīla-sūtra, one fascicle (also called Mahābhikṣu Sūtra, also called Sūtra on True and False Śramaṇas), translated by the śramaṇa Shi Tuigong under the Eastern Jin (First translation)
The above has had two translations; one is extant and one is lost.
Upāsaka-pañcaśīla-sūtra, one fascicle (also called Sūtra of the Five Marks), translated by the householder Juqu Jingsheng under the Song (Second translation)
The above has had two translations; one is extant and one is lost.
Miscellaenous Inquiries on Vinaya Matters, two fascicles, translated by the Western Regions śramaṇa Dharmadhara under the Eastern Jin (First translation)
Miscellaneous Inquiries on Vinaya Matters, two fascicles, translated by the Kashmir śramaṇa Vimalākṣa under the Eastern Jin (Second translation)
The above two miscellaneous texts are different translations of the same text; both texts are lost. (The Jingtai Catalogue says: Dharmapī of the Later Qin translated the Sarvāstivāda-vinaya Explaining the Inquiries on Miscellaneous Matters in two fascicles. The Baochang Catalogue says: The Kashmir śramaṇa Dharmayaśas of the Later Qin translated the Sarvāstivāda-vinaya Miscellaneous Matters in one fascicle. These two accounts are mostly errors by cataloguers in persons' names, or perhaps they are the aforementioned first translation. The Changfang and Neidian catalogues both say they were translated under the Eastern Jin, not translated under the Qin dynasty; following these two catalogues is correct. The Changfang Catalogue also says: The Dharmadhara translation clarifies that the property of the Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha involves each other with disparate demarcations, which is very critical and must be guarded well. Now in the canon there is the Sūtra of Five Hundred Inquiries in one fascicle of thirty-three sheets, which also clarifies that the property of the Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha must not be intermingled. Although the matters are identical, their titles differ, and the reason is not known. The other catalogues' claim that it was extracted from the Sarvāstivāda-vinaya refers to the Sūtra of Five Hundred Inquiries clarifying matters such as receiving the day for thirty-nine nights, which indeed accords with the Sarvāstivāda. Yet because the titles differ, it has not been definitively settled. Let later learned persons examine and rectify it).
Method for Instructing Bhikṣuṇīs, one fascicle, translated by the Kashmir Tripiṭaka master Gautama Saṅghadeva under the Eastern Jin (Sole translation)
Two-Year Dana Text for Instructing Bhikṣuṇīs, one fascicle (some lack the word "Bhikṣuṇī"), translated by the Western Regions śramaṇa Dharmadhara together with Zhu Fonian under the Fu Qin (Sole translation)
Combined Differences of the Three Recensions of the Two Hundred and Sixty Precepts, two fascicles (preface adds the words "Great Bhikṣu"), compiled by the Western Regions śramaṇa Zhu Tanwulan under the Eastern Jin
(The preface to the combined precepts says: On the twenty-fifth day of the sixth month, the xinsi year, the sixth year of Taiyuan of the Jin, the bhikṣu Zhu Tanwulan collated these three sets of precepts at the Xie Zhenxi Temple, finishing on the eighteenth day of the seventh month; hence it is recorded. Furthermore, the Changfang and Neidian catalogues, as well as Jingmai's Scripture Charts, all say that during the reign of Emperor Ming of the Han, the śramaṇa Zhu Falan translated the Combined Differences of the Two Hundred and Sixty Precepts in two fascicles. Now examining this account, it is certainly not so by principle. When the Buddha-Dharma was first flourishing, the vinaya was not yet complete; where could combined differences of precepts have come from? In my humble opinion, it was merely combined by Zhu Tanwulan. Both persons share the same surname and given name; the cataloguers mistakenly took Tanwu as Fa, returning it to Falan. Thus, the Biographies of Eminent Monks lists only other works translated by Falan, with no such title of precepts. In the present catalogue, it is abolished and not retained. What Tanwu combined was not a proper translation, and should not be included in this catalogue either; but because of the error between the two accounts, it is preserved and noted here).
Sthavirīya-vinaya, one fascicle (translated in Qi as Vinaya of the Venerable Elders), translated by the Western Regions Tripiṭaka master Mahāyāna under the Southern Qi (Sole translation)
Saṃyuktaka-vinaya, one fascicle (translated in Chen as Comprehensive Summary), translated by the Indian Tripiṭaka master Paramārtha under the Chen (Sole translation)
Sūtra on the Vinaya of Bequeathed Teachings, three fascicles (also called Samādhi on the Vinaya of Bequeathed Teachings, also called Bequeathed Teachings Samādhi; or two fascicles), translated by the śramaṇa Shi Faju under the Western Jin (Sole translation)
Sūtra on the Six Fast Days and Eight Precepts, one fascicle, translated by the Indian Tripiṭaka master Guṇabhadra under the Song (Sole translation)
Sūtra on the Vinaya Rules of the Worthy, one fascicle (also called Deportment), translated by the householder Juqu Jingsheng under the Song (Sole translation)
Saṅgha Classifications, Numerals, Matters, and Practices, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Later Han
Various Prohibitory Precepts for Bhikṣus, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Later Han
Essential Collection for Bhikṣus of the Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya, one fascicle (also called Rules of the Essential Collection for Daily Use of Bhikṣus of the Mahāsāṃghika School), anonymous translation of the Later Han
Sūtra on the Ten Precepts of the Śrāmaṇera, one fascicle (the old catalogue says Precepts of the Śrāmaṇera), anonymous translation of the Later Han
Sūtra on the Ten Precepts of the Śrāmaṇerī, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Later Han
Sūtra on the Five Precepts of the Worthy, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Later Han
Sūtra on the Deportment of the Upāsaka, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Later Han
Great Precept Sūtra, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Wei or Wu
Sūtra on Rules for Robes, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Wei or Wu
Deportment of the Śrāmaṇera, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Wei or Wu
Sūtra on the Five Precepts as the Root of the Path, one fascicle, anonymous translation of the Wei or Wu
Deportment Sūtra, one fascicle (in the Fajing Catalogue there is no word "Sūtra"), anonymous translation of the Wei or Wu
Vinaya of What Should Be Practiced, one fascicle; the Sengyou Catalogue says it is an anonymous translation sūtra from Dao'an's list (appended to the Western Jin catalogue)
Sūtra on the Robes Worn according to the Deportment of the Five Schools, one fascicle (also called Sūtra on the Monastic Robes of the Five Schools; the Biographies of Eminent Monks says it was translated by Bo Fazu); an anonymous translation sūtra in the Sengyou Catalogue (now appended to the Song catalogue)
Sūtra of the Text on Demarcating Boundaries, one fascicle, an anonymous translation sūtra in the Sengyou Catalogue (now appended to the Song catalogue)
Precepts of the Śrāmaṇera, one fascicle, an anonymous translation sūtra in the Sengyou Catalogue (now appended to the Song catalogue)
Sūtra on the Karmic Retribution of the Five Precepts, one fascicle, an anonymous translation sūtra in the Sengyou Catalogue (now appended to the Song catalogue)