貞元新定釋教目錄 23.19

23.19

阿毘曇八揵度論三十卷（迦旃延子造或二十卷）　三帙
　符秦罽賓三藏僧伽提婆共竺佛念譯　第
一譯
阿毘達磨發智論二十卷（迦多衍尼子造）　二帙
　大唐三藏玄奘譯　出內典錄　第二譯
右上二論同本異譯。即是說一切有部對
法藏之根本。佛圓寂後三百年中。論師迦
多衍尼子之所造也。後代傳人本有廣略。
此發智論文義具足。傳習之者號為身論。
以餘六論各辯一支。有異於身故名為足。
次編於後諸部繼焉。
一阿毘達磨法蘊足論十二卷（尊者大採菽氏造）　一帙
　大唐三藏玄奘譯　出內典錄　單本
二阿毘達磨集異門足論二十卷（尊者舍利子說）　二帙
　大唐三藏玄奘譯　出內典錄　單本
第三施設足論　有一萬八千頌。尊者大迦
多衍那造（迦多此云剪剃衍此云種那是男聲婆羅門中一姓）
　其論未譯
上三足論並佛在世時造。
四阿毘達磨識身足論十六卷
　大唐三藏玄奘譯　出內典錄　單本
右一論佛圓寂後一百年尊者提婆設摩（唐云
天寂）阿羅漢造。
五阿毘達磨品類足論十八卷
　大唐三藏玄奘譯　出內典錄　第二譯
右一論佛圓寂後三百年中尊者筏蘇蜜多
羅（唐云世友造）。
眾事分阿毘曇論十二卷
　宋天竺三藏求那陀羅共菩提舍譯　第一
譯
右二論同本異譯。
上二論二十卷三帙。
六阿毘達磨界身足論三卷
　大唐三藏玄奘譯　出翻經圖　單本
右一論佛圓寂後三百年中尊者世友造
與上識身足論共十九卷二帙。
阿毘曇毘婆沙論六十卷（或八十四卷或一百九卷）　北涼天竺
沙門浮陀跋摩共道泰等譯　第一譯
右此論創譯百卷成部。沙門道挻製序。屬魏
併涼失四十卷。今唯六十卷在。但畢第三
揵度下五揵度時闕其本。新譯之者八蘊
並足。其八十四卷本及一百九卷者。後人
分六十卷成。非是元來不闕（又按梁僧祐法苑云天監十一
年二月勅僧伽婆羅更出婆沙餘五揵度雖有此說本仍未覩）。
阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論二百卷　二十帙
　大唐三藏玄奘譯
　出內典錄
右上二論同本異譯。即釋上發智論。佛圓
寂後四百年中。五百大阿羅漢等於迦濕
彌羅國造。
阿毘達磨俱舍論二十二卷（婆藪盤豆造）
　陳天竺三藏真諦譯　第一譯
阿毘達磨俱舍論本頌一卷　尊者世親造　（或
三卷）
　大唐三藏玄奘譯　出內典錄　第二譯
真諦譯者闕本
上二論二十三卷三帙。
阿毘達磨俱舍論三十卷　尊者世親造　三
帙
　大唐三藏玄奘譯
　出內典錄　第二譯
右二論及頌同本異譯。
阿毘達磨順正理論八十卷　尊者眾賢造
　八帙
　大唐三藏玄奘譯
　出內典錄　單本
阿毘達磨顯宗論四十卷　尊者眾賢造　四
帙
　大唐三藏玄奘譯
　出內典錄　單本
右二部論與俱舍論頌同釋異。並眾賢造
（眾賢尊者先述正理文廣難尋後造顯宗略而易曉所以重譯）。
阿毘曇心論四卷　尊者法勝造（或無論字）
　東晉罽賓三藏瞿曇僧伽提婆譯　單本
法勝阿毘曇心論經六卷　大德復波扇多造
（或七卷）
　高齊天竺三藏那連提耶舍共法智譯　單
本上二論十卷同帙。
雜阿毘曇心論十一卷（亦云雜阿毘曇毘婆沙尊者法救造或十四卷）　宋天
竺三藏僧伽跋摩譯
　第四譯　四譯三闕
上三論俱名阿毘曇心。然其所釋廣略有
異（雜阿毘曇心論第一卷初注云。諸師釋法略也。優波扇多有八千偈釋。又有一師萬二千偈釋。二論名為廣也。
修槃頭以六千偈釋又論初頌云。敬禮尊法勝。所說我頂受。我達摩多羅說彼未曾說故。上三論初四卷者是法勝
本論。次六卷者是優波扇多釋故。彼論末云。大德優波扇多為利益弟子故造此阿毘曇心論。故知此即釋法勝論。
非法勝造而論外題云有法勝字者。或恐不然。論卷中題無二字。群錄皆云法勝阿毘曇。或云別譯法勝阿毘曇。後
雜心論是法救造。比前二論。文義稍廣）。
阿毘曇甘露味論二卷（或云甘露味阿毘曇尊者瞿沙造）
　曹魏代譯失論三藏名　單本
隨相論一卷（或云求那跋摩諦隨相論德慧法師造或二卷）
　陳天竺三藏真諦譯　單本
上三論十四卷二帙。
尊婆須蜜菩薩所集論十卷（尊者婆須密造或十四卷或十二卷）
　符秦罽賓三藏僧伽跋澄等譯　單本
二法度論二卷（或無論字或云經或三卷或云一卷）　東晉罽賓三藏
瞿曇僧伽提婆譯
　第二譯（兩譯一闕）
（右此三法度論有本有釋本有三章九真度釋亦有九品盧山遠法師序云本是尊者山賢造釋是天竺大乘居士
僧伽先撰經後記云大乘比丘釋僧伽撰二說少殊未詳孰正之也）。
入阿毘達磨論二卷（塞建陀羅阿羅漢造）
　大唐三藏玄奘譯
　出內典錄　單本
上三論十四卷二帙。
成實論二十卷　訶梨跋摩造（凡二百二品或二十四卷）
　姚秦三藏鳩摩羅什譯　單本
立世阿毘曇論十卷（或無論字）　一帙（或十五卷）
　陳天竺三藏真諦譯　單本
解脫道論十二卷（或十三卷）　一帙
　梁扶南三藏僧伽婆羅譯　單本
舍利弗阿毘曇論二十二卷（或二十卷或三十卷）
　姚秦罽賓三藏曇摩耶舍共曇摩崛多譯
　單本
五事毘婆沙論二卷（亦云阿毘達磨五事論尊者法救造）
　大唐三藏玄奘譯
　出翻經圖　單本
上二論二十四卷　二帙（大周錄中別載阿毘達磨五事論者誤也）。
鞞婆沙論十四卷（亦云鞞婆沙阿毘曇論阿羅漢七陀槃尼撰）
　符秦罽賓三藏僧伽跋登譯　單本
三彌底部論三卷（或無部字或云四卷）
　失譯（三彌底者此云正量即正量部中論也）
　今附秦錄　單本
上二論十七卷二帙。
分別功德論四卷（或云分別功德經或三卷或五卷）
　失譯　在後漢錄　單本
（右此一論釋增一阿含經義初序品至弟子品過半釋王比丘即止法上錄云竺法護譯者不然此中牒經解釋文
句並同本經似與增一阿含同一人譯而餘錄並云失源且依此定僧祐錄云迦葉阿難撰者此亦不然如論第一
卷中引外國師薩婆多說故知非是二尊所撰）。
四諦論四卷　婆藪跋摩造
　陳天竺三藏真諦譯（單本）
辟支佛因緣論二卷
　失譯　今附秦錄　單本
十八部論一卷
　新為失譯　附三秦錄　第一譯
（右十八部論。按尋群錄並云梁代三藏真諦譯。今詳真諦三藏已譯十八部論不合更譯部異執論。其十八部論初
首引文殊問經分別品。品後次云羅什師集。後方是論。若是羅什所翻。秦時未有文殊問經。不合引之置於初也。
或可準別錄中文殊問經編為失譯。秦時引證此亦無疑。若是真諦再譯。論中子注不合有秦言之字。詳其文理多
是秦時羅什譯出。諸錄脫漏致有疑焉。其真諦十八部疏即部異執疏。是雖有斯理未敢指南。後諸傳聞請求實錄）。
部執異論一卷（亦名部異執論）
　陳天竺三藏真諦譯　第一譯
異部宗輪論一卷　世友菩薩造
　大唐三藏玄奘譯　出翻經圖　第三譯
右三論同本異譯　上六論十三卷同帙。

Abhidharma-aṣṭagrantha-śāstra, 30 fascicles (composed by Kātyāyanīputra; also in 20 fascicles), 3 wrappers.
Translated by the Fu Qin Tripiṭaka master Saṅghadeva of Kashmīr together with Zhu Fonian. First translation.
Abhidharmājñānaprasthāna-śāstra, 20 fascicles (composed by Kātyāyanīputra), 2 wrappers.
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang; appears in the Neidian lu. Second translation.
The two treatises above are different translations of the same text. They are the root of the Abhidharma-piṭaka of the Sarvāstivāda school, composed within the three hundred years after the Buddha's parinirvāṇa by the master Kātyāyanīputra. Later transmitters handed down texts that were either extensive or abridged. The text and meaning of this Jñānaprasthāna are complete, so practitioners refer to it as the 'body treatise' (śarīra-śāstra). Because each of the other six treatises expounds a single branch, differing from the body, they are called 'feet' (pāda). They are arranged next in sequence, followed by those of other schools.
1. Abhidharma-dharmaskandha-pāda-śāstra, 12 fascicles (composed by the Venerable Mahāmaudgalyāyana), 1 wrapper.
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang; appears in the Neidian lu. Single translation.
2. Abhidharma-saṅgītiparyāya-pāda-śāstra, 20 fascicles (spoken by the Venerable Śāriputra), 2 wrappers.
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang; appears in the Neidian lu. Single translation.
3. Prajñapti-pāda-śāstra, consisting of 18,000 verses, composed by the Venerable Mahākātyāyana (kātya here means 'tonsure', āyana means 'lineage', and na indicates masculine gender; a brāhmaṇa clan name).
This treatise has not yet been translated.
The above three pāda treatises were all composed while the Buddha was in the world.
4. Abhidharma-vijñānakāya-pāda-śāstra, 16 fascicles.
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang; appears in the Neidian lu. Single translation.
The one treatise above was composed one hundred years after the Buddha's parinirvāṇa by the Venerable Arhat Devaśarman (translated in Tang as Tianji).
5. Abhidharma-prakaraṇa-pāda-śāstra, 18 fascicles.
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang; appears in the Neidian lu. Second translation.
The one treatise above was composed within the three hundred years after the Buddha's parinirvāṇa by the Venerable Vasumitra (translated in Tang as Shiyou).
Zhongshi fen apitan lun (Abhidharma-prakaraṇapāda-śāstra), 12 fascicles.
Translated by the Song Indian Tripiṭaka master Guṇabhadra together with Bodhiyaśa. First translation.
The two treatises above are different translations of the same text.
The above two treatises total 20 fascicles in 3 wrappers.
6. Abhidharma-dhātukāya-pāda-śāstra, 3 fascicles.
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang; appears in the Fanjing tu. Single translation.
The one treatise above was composed within the three hundred years after the Buddha's parinirvāṇa by the Venerable Vasumitra.
Together with the above Vijñānakāya-pāda-śāstra, making 19 fascicles in 2 wrappers.
Abhidharma-vibhāṣā-śāstra, 60 fascicles (also in 84 fascicles or 109 fascicles).
Translated by the Northern Liang Indian śramaṇa Buddhavarman together with Daotai and others. First translation.
The translation of this treatise was originally completed in 100 fascicles as a work, with a preface composed by the śramaṇa Daoyan. When the Wei annexed the Liang, 40 fascicles were lost, and now only 60 fascicles remain, concluding merely at the third grantha; the original text for the lower five granthas is missing at present. The new translation contains all eight granthas in full. The editions in 84 fascicles and 109 fascicles were formed by later individuals dividing the 60 fascicles; they are not originally complete texts. (Also, examining Sengyou's Fayuan of the Liang, it states that in the second month of the eleventh year of Tianjian, an imperial order commanded Saṅghapāla to re-translate the remaining five granthas of the Vibhāṣā; although this is stated, that text has still not been seen).
Abhidharma-mahāvibhāṣā-śāstra, 200 fascicles, 20 wrappers.
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang;
appears in the Neidian lu.
The two treatises above are different translations of the same text, which comments upon the Jñānaprasthāna above. Within the four hundred years after the Buddha's parinirvāṇa, it was composed in the country of Kaśmīra by five hundred great arhats and others.
Abhidharmakośa-śāstra, 22 fascicles (composed by Vasubandhu).
Translated by the Chen Indian Tripiṭaka master Paramārtha. First translation.
Root verses of the Abhidharmakośa-śāstra, 1 fascicle, composed by the Venerable Vasubandhu (also in 3 fascicles).
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang; appears in the Neidian lu. Second translation.
The version translated by Paramārtha is missing.
The above two treatises total 23 fascicles in 3 wrappers.
Abhidharmakośa-śāstra, 30 fascicles, composed by the Venerable Vasubandhu, 3 wrappers.
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang;
appears in the Neidian lu. Second translation.
The two treatises and the verses above are different translations of the same text.
Abhidharma-nyāyānusāra-śāstra, 80 fascicles, composed by the Venerable Saṅghabhadra, 8 wrappers.
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang;
appears in the Neidian lu. Single translation.
Abhidharma-samayapradīpikā-śāstra, 40 fascicles, composed by the Venerable Saṅghabhadra, 4 wrappers.
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang;
appears in the Neidian lu. Single translation.
The two treatises above share the verses with the Kośa-śāstra but provide different commentaries; both were composed by Saṅghabhadra. (The Venerable Saṅghabhadra first composed the Nyāyānusāra, whose text is extensive and difficult to investigate; later he composed the Samayapradīpikā, which is concise and easy to understand, hence the repeated translation).
Abhidharma-hṛdaya-śāstra, 4 fascicles, composed by the Venerable Dharmaśreṣṭhin (or without the word 'śāstra').
Translated by the Eastern Jin Tripiṭaka master Gautama Saṅghadeva of Kashmīr. Single translation.
Dharmaśreṣṭhin's Abhidharma-hṛdaya-sūtra-śāstra, 6 fascicles, composed by the Bhadanta Upaśānta (or in 7 fascicles).
Translated by the Northern Qi Indian Tripiṭaka master Narendrayaśas together with Fazhi. Single translation. The above two treatises total 10 fascicles in the same wrapper.
Saṃyuktābhidharma-hṛdaya-śāstra, 11 fascicles (also called Saṃyuktābhidharma-vibhāṣā; composed by the Venerable Dharmatrāta; or in 14 fascicles).
Translated by the Song Indian Tripiṭaka master Saṅghavarman.
Fourth translation; three of the four translations are lost.
The three treatises above are all named Abhidharma-hṛdaya, yet their commentaries differ in length and brevity. (An annotation at the beginning of the first fascicle of the Saṃyuktābhidharma-hṛdaya-śāstra states: 'The masters explain the Dharma concisely. Upaśānta provided an explanation in 8,000 verses, and another master provided an explanation in 12,000 verses; these two treatises are called extensive. Vasubandhu explained it in 6,000 verses.' Moreover, the opening verse of the treatise states: 'Reverently I bow to the Venerable Dharmaśreṣṭhin; what he taught, I accept upon my crown. I, Dharmatrāta, expound what he did not yet say.' Thus, the first four fascicles of the three treatises above are the root treatise by Dharmaśreṣṭhin. The following six fascicles are the commentary by Upaśānta, for the end of that treatise states: 'The Bhadanta Upaśānta composed this Abhidharma-hṛdaya-śāstra for the benefit of his disciples.' Hence we know that this comments upon Dharmaśreṣṭhin's treatise and was not composed by Dharmaśreṣṭhin; that the external title of the treatise contains the words 'Dharmaśreṣṭhin' is perhaps doubtful. The title within the scrolls of the treatise lacks these two words. Various catalogues all call it Dharmaśreṣṭhin's Abhidharma, or call it the alternative translation of Dharmaśreṣṭhin's Abhidharma. The subsequent Saṃyukta-hṛdaya-śāstra was composed by Dharmatrāta; compared to the preceding two treatises, its text and doctrine are slightly more extensive).
Abhidharma-amṛtarasa-śāstra, 2 fascicles (or called Amṛtarasābhidharma; composed by the Venerable Ghoṣaka).
Translated under the Cao Wei dynasty; the name of the Tripiṭaka master who translated the treatise is lost. Single translation.
Lakṣaṇānusāra-śāstra, 1 fascicle (or called Guṇavarma-satya-lakṣaṇānusāra-śāstra; composed by Master Gunamati; or in 2 fascicles).
Translated by the Chen Indian Tripiṭaka master Paramārtha. Single translation.
The above three treatises total 14 fascicles in 2 wrappers.
Treatise Collected by the Bodhisattva Venerable Vasumitra, 10 fascicles (composed by the Venerable Vasumitra; or in 14 fascicles, or 12 fascicles).
Translated by the Fu Qin Tripiṭaka master Saṅghabhūti and others of Kashmīr. Single translation.
Sanfadu lun (Tridharmaka-śāstra), 2 fascicles (or without the word 'śāstra', or called 'sūtra', or in 3 fascicles, or in 1 fascicle).
Translated by the Eastern Jin Tripiṭaka master Gautama Saṅghadeva of Kashmīr.
Second translation (one of the two translations is lost).
(The above Tridharmaka-śāstra consists of a root text and a commentary. The root has three sections and nine true salvations; the commentary also has nine chapters. Master Huiyuan of Mount Lu states in his preface: 'The root was originally composed by the Venerable Giribhadra, and the commentary was compiled by the Indian Mahāyāna upāsaka Saṅghaśreṣṭhin.' A postscript to the scripture states: 'Compiled by the Mahāyāna bhikṣu Shi Sengjia.' The two accounts differ slightly, and it is not yet clear which is correct).
Abhidharmāvatāra-śāstra, 2 fascicles (composed by the Arhat Skandhila).
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang;
appears in the Neidian lu. Single translation.
The above three treatises total 14 fascicles in 2 wrappers.
Tattvasiddhi-śāstra, 20 fascicles, composed by Harivarman (in 202 chapters in all; or in 24 fascicles).
Translated by the Yao Qin Tripiṭaka master Kumārajīva. Single translation.
Lokasthiti-abhidharma-śāstra, 10 fascicles (or without the word 'śāstra'), 1 wrapper (or in 15 fascicles).
Translated by the Chen Indian Tripiṭaka master Paramārtha. Single translation.
Vimuttimagga, 12 fascicles (or 13 fascicles), 1 wrapper.
Translated by the Liang Tripiṭaka master Saṅghapāla of Funan. Single translation.
Śāriputrābhidharma-śāstra, 22 fascicles (or 20 fascicles, or 30 fascicles).
Translated by the Yao Qin Tripiṭaka masters Dharmayaśas and Dharmagupta of Kashmīr.
Single translation.
Pañcavastuka-vibhāṣā-śāstra, 2 fascicles (also called Abhidharma-pañcavastuka-śāstra; composed by the Venerable Dharmatrāta).
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang;
appears in the Fanjing tu. Single translation.
The above two treatises total 24 fascicles in 2 wrappers. (The listing of the Abhidharma-pañcavastuka-śāstra separately in the Great Zhou Catalogue is an error).
Vibhāṣā-śāstra, 14 fascicles (also called Vibhāṣābhidharma-śāstra; compiled by the Arhat Śītavani).
Translated by the Fu Qin Tripiṭaka master Saṅghabhadra of Kashmīr. Single translation.
Saṃmatīya-śāstra, 3 fascicles (or without the word 'school', or in 4 fascicles).
Translator lost (Saṃmitī here means 'Correct Measure', namely a treatise of the Saṃmatīya school).
Now appended to the Qin catalogue. Single translation.
The above two treatises total 17 fascicles in 2 wrappers.
Fenbie gongde lun (Guṇanirdeśa-śāstra), 4 fascicles (or called Fenbie gongde jing; or in 3 fascicles, or 5 fascicles).
Translator lost; entered in the Later Han catalogue. Single translation.
(This one treatise explains the meaning of the Ekottarikāgama-sūtra, from the opening Introductory Chapter past the middle of the Disciples Chapter, stopping after explaining King Bhikṣu. Master Fashang's catalogue stating that it was translated by Dharmarakṣa is incorrect. The citations and explanations of scripture herein match the phrases of the original sūtra exactly, appearing to have been translated by the same person as the Ekottarikāgama, yet other catalogues all state that the source is lost; we tentatively determine it based on this. Sengyou's catalogue stating that it was compiled by Kāśyapa and Ānanda is also incorrect, because in the first fascicle of the treatise it cites foreign masters of the Sarvāstivāda school; thus we know it was not compiled by those two venerables).
Catuḥsatya-śāstra, 4 fascicles, composed by Vasuvarman.
Translated by the Chen Indian Tripiṭaka master Paramārtha (single translation).
Pratyekabuddha-nidāna-śāstra, 2 fascicles.
Translator lost; now appended to the Qin catalogue. Single translation.
Shiba bu lun (Treatise on the Eighteen Schools), 1 fascicle.
Newly listed as translator lost; appended to the San Qin catalogue. First translation.
(Regarding this Shiba bu lun: examining the various catalogues, they all state that it was translated by the Tripiṭaka master Paramārtha of the Liang dynasty. Considering now that the Tripiṭaka master Paramārtha had already translated the Treatise on the Eighteen Schools, it would be inappropriate for him to translate the Samayabhedoparacanacakra again. At the very beginning of this Shiba bu lun, it cites the Chapter on Distinction from the Mañjuśrīparipṛcchā-sūtra, followed immediately by 'Compiled by Master Kumārajīva', after which the treatise itself begins. If it was translated by Kumārajīva, the Mañjuśrīparipṛcchā-sūtra did not yet exist during the Qin era, so it would be improper to cite it at the beginning. Alternatively, following the Detailed Catalogue where the Mañjuśrīparipṛcchā-sūtra is catalogued as translator lost, its citation during the Qin era would likewise raise no doubt. If it was re-translated by Paramārtha, the interlinear glosses within the treatise should not contain the phrase 'in the Qin language'. Examining its text and logic, it was mostly translated by Kumārajīva during the Qin, but omissions in various catalogues gave rise to doubts. Paramārtha's commentary on the Eighteen Schools is in fact the commentary on the Samayabhedoparacanacakra. Although this reasoning exists, I dare not pronounce it conclusively; I request later knowledgeable persons to ascertain the authentic record).
Buzhiyi lun (Samayabhedoparacanacakra), 1 fascicle (also named Bu yizhi lun).
Translated by the Chen Indian Tripiṭaka master Paramārtha. First translation.
Samayabhedoparacanacakra, 1 fascicle, composed by the Bodhisattva Vasumitra.
Translated by the Great Tang Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang; appears in the Fanjing tu. Third translation.
The three treatises above are different translations of the same text. The above six treatises total 13 fascicles in the same wrapper.