御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演 2.210

2.210

釋意以彼聚集無物可取。但隨於聲虛妄分別故是顛倒。若有實者即是正見。上來彼論非但喻顯。真化一異亦是因破我法二見所緣境無即同此論。此論第一無所見方便訖。

The explanation means: because in that aggregation there is no thing to be grasped, merely following after sounds they falsely conceptualize; therefore it is an inversion. If it were real, it would be right view. Above, that treatise not only used metaphors to reveal the oneness and difference of the true and transformation [bodies], but also, through refuting the two views of self and dharmas, showed that their objective supports are non-existent, which is identical to this treatise. This treatise's first part, on the skillful means of having nothing to be seen, is concluded.