御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演 2.98

2.98

經。若菩薩通達至真是菩薩　演曰。四結真菩薩。不言我能是達生空無土可嚴。是達法空如來說為是真菩薩。返顯有執不達二空非真菩薩。依餘本經有。二無我及二菩薩。准此論釋者。一者人無我。二法無我。即由二無我故顯二菩薩。今但總舉彼論云生心即是倒非菩薩者。起何等心名為菩薩。即指此文。又頌言。

Sūtra: “If a bodhisattva penetrates [...] is truly a bodhisattva.”
Exposition: Fourth, concluding with the true bodhisattva. Not saying “I am able” is penetrating the emptiness of persons, and having no land to adorn is penetrating the emptiness of phenomena; such a one is spoken of by the Tathāgata as truly a bodhisattva. This conversely reveals that one who possesses clinging and fails to penetrate the two emptinesses is not a true bodhisattva. Following other versions of the sūtra, there are the two selflessnesses and the two bodhisattvas. According to the commentary's explanation: first is the selflessness of persons, and second is the selflessness of phenomena. It is precisely through the two selflessnesses that the two bodhisattvas are revealed. Here it merely mentions them generally. That commentary says: "To give rise to a conception is an inversion, and such a one is not a bodhisattva." What kind of conception arisen is called a bodhisattva? It precisely refers to this passage. Furthermore, the verse states: