金剛般若經旨贊 2.123

2.123

經。須菩提至名為菩薩　贊曰。此釋義所由也。以於俗諦攬五蘊成。若於真諦都無名相。若俗若真。何有一法名菩薩者。恃何起慢言我度耶。

Sūtra: “Subhūti, [...] is called a bodhisattva.”
Commentary: This explains the reason for the meaning. Because under conventional truth, one is formed by bringing together the five aggregates, while under ultimate truth, there are no names or signs whatsoever. Whether conventional or ultimate, how could there be any single dharma named “bodhisattva”? Relying on what could one generate pride, saying, “I cross over beings”?