金剛般若經旨贊 2.160

2.160

經。若人言至我所說故　贊曰。此釋也。若言如來於真於俗。即如離如而有所說。即言離言能詮所詮實體法者。有所說故有所不說。是即如來語不具足不解義故。豈非謗佛。

Sūtra: “If a person says […] what I have taught.”

Praise: This is the explanation. If one says that the Tathāgata, in the ultimate or the conventional, identical with or apart from suchness, has something taught, [claiming that] words and what is beyond words, the expressing and the expressed, are real entities and dharmas, then because there would be something taught, there would be something not taught; this would mean that the Tathāgata's speech is not fully endowed. Because they do not understand the meaning, how could this not be slandering the Buddha?