金剛般若經挾註 1.1.9

1.1.9

不了空義）須菩提。 如來說有我者。 則非有我。 而凡夫之人。 以為有我（前云我於然燈佛所。 則是說有我也。 然但曉凡順俗。 非係有我不同。 凡夫執著我相）須菩提。 凡夫者。 如來說即非凡夫（未達中道。 是名凡夫。 了般若空。 則證等覺故。 即非凡夫）須菩提。 於意云何。 可以三十二相。 觀如來不（乘如證覺。 既非有我故。 不應以三十二相觀）須菩提言。 如是如是。 以三十二相觀如來（凡夫之人。 以相求佛）佛言須菩提。 若以三十二相。 觀如來者。 轉輪聖王。 則是如來（汝若以相。 見如來者。 轉輪聖王。 亦具是相。 則應是如來。 輪王既非如來。 故如來不應以三十二相見）須菩提。 白佛言世尊。 如我解佛所說義。 不應以三十二相觀如來（善吉深達法性故。 不作凡夫解）爾時世尊。 而說偈言（以偈如頌非四句義）。

one does not understand the meaning of emptiness.) "Subhūti, when the Tathāgata says there is a self, there is no self; yet pṛthagjanas consider there to be a self." (Earlier he said, 'When I was with Dīpaṃkara Buddha,' which is speaking of there being a self. Yet it was only to instruct ordinary people in accordance with worldly convention, not that there is a self; it is not the same as pṛthagjanas clinging to the notion of a self.) "Subhūti, as for pṛthagjanas, the Tathāgata says that they are not pṛthagjanas." (Those who have not reached the middle way are called pṛthagjanas. Understanding the emptiness of prajñā, one then realizes equal enlightenment; therefore, they are not pṛthagjanas.) "Subhūti, what do you think? Can the Tathāgata be contemplated by means of the thirty-two marks?" (Riding upon suchness to realize enlightenment, there is no self; therefore, he should not be contemplated by means of the thirty-two marks.) Subhūti said: "So it is, so it is: the Tathāgata is to be contemplated by means of the thirty-two marks." (Pṛthagjanas seek the Buddha through marks.) The Buddha said: "Subhūti, if the Tathāgata were to be contemplated by means of the thirty-two marks, a cakravartin would be a Tathāgata." (If you see the Tathāgata through marks, a cakravartin also possesses these marks, and thus should be a Tathāgata. Since a cakravartin is not a Tathāgata, the Tathāgata should not be seen by means of the thirty-two marks.) Subhūti said to the Buddha: "Bhagavat, as I understand the meaning of what the Buddha has spoken, the Tathāgata should not be contemplated by means of the thirty-two marks." (Subhūti deeply penetrates dharma-nature; therefore, he does not form the understanding of a pṛthagjana.) At that time, the Bhagavat spoke a gāthā, saying: (Using a gāthā like a hymn, not the meaning of four lines.)