淨名經集解關中疏 1.389

1.389

若須菩提不斷婬怒癡。亦不與俱　此下二明染淨等文三。初約無生四諦問。二就人凡聖問。三結成可食。初文四句。此初了惑無生為集諦。肇曰。斷婬怒癡聲聞婬怒癡俱凡夫。大士觀婬怒癡。即是涅槃故不斷不俱。若能如是者乃可取食也。

"'If Subhūti does not sever lust, anger, and delusion, nor dwell together with them;" Below, the second part clarifies the equality of defilement and purity, in three parts: first, inquiring in terms of the unarisen Four Truths; second, inquiring with respect to ordinary beings and sages; third, concluding that [the food] may be taken. The first text has four clauses. This first one understands afflictions as unarisen, which is the truth of origin. Sengzhao says: Severing lust, anger, and delusion belongs to the śrāvakas; dwelling together with lust, anger, and delusion belongs to ordinary beings. The Great Being contemplates lust, anger, and delusion as being none other than nirvāṇa, hence neither severing nor dwelling together with them. If one can be like this, only then may one take the food.