瑜伽師地論分門記 1.235

1.235

第二釋思擇所知分二　一略釋分五。一總問。二略答。三徵問。四解釋。五結　二廣解有性法無性法有二異門　初門分二。一明有法。二明無法　初文分四。一總問。二略答。三列名。四廣解分五。一明自相有法分五。一總問。二略答。三列名。四解釋分三。一明勝義相有分二。一標。二釋。二明相狀相有分二。一標。二釋分四如論。三明現在相有分二。一標。二釋。五總結。第二明共相有法分五。一總問。二略答。三列名。四解釋分五如論。五總結。第三明假相有法分六。一總問。二略答。三徵問。四答列名。五解釋分六。一明屬主相應言論分四。一標。二釋分三。一明正義。二引喻。三例餘。三結四明假相。二明遠離此彼言論分五。一總標。二略明遠離。三列名。四別釋分三如論。五總結。三明眾共施設言論分三。一標釋。二列名。三解釋分六如論。四明眾法聚集言論分二。一標釋。二明正義分二。一依內明假法。二依外明假法。五明不遍一切言論分二。一標釋。二明正義分四如論。六明非常言論分四。一略標釋。二列名。三解釋分四如論。四結。第六明總結　第四明因相有法分五。一總問。二略答。三列名。四解釋分五如論。五總結。第五明果相有法分三。一問。二答分五如論。三結　第二釋無法分四。一總問。二略答。三列名。四解釋分五如論。

Second, explaining the discernment of the knowable (jñeya-pravicaya) has two parts: 1. brief explanation, which has five parts: (1) general question; (2) brief answer; (3) inquiry; (4) explanation; (5) conclusion; 2. detailed explanation of existent entities and non-existent entities, which has two alternative approaches. The first approach has two parts: (1) clarifying existent entities; (2) clarifying non-existent entities. The first text has four parts: [a] general question; [b] brief answer; [c] listing the names; [d] detailed explanation, which has five parts: [i] clarifying entities existent by self-characteristic, which has five parts: (i) general question; (ii) brief answer; (iii) listing the names; (iv) explanation, which has three parts: a. clarifying existence with ultimate characteristics, which has two parts: (a) statement, (b) explanation; b. clarifying existence with phenomenal appearance characteristics, which has two parts: (a) statement, (b) explanation, which has four parts as in the treatise; c. clarifying existence with present characteristics, which has two parts: (a) statement, (b) explanation; and (v) general conclusion; [ii] clarifying entities existent by common characteristic, which has five parts: (i) general question; (ii) brief answer; (iii) listing the names; (iv) explanation, which has five parts as in the treatise; (v) general conclusion; [iii] clarifying entities existent by conventional characteristic, which has six parts: (i) general question; (ii) brief answer; (iii) inquiry; (iv) answer listing the names; (v) explanation, which has six parts: a. clarifying discourse associated with ownership, which has four parts: (a) statement; (b) explanation, which has three parts: 1) clarifying the correct meaning, 2) citing an analogy, 3) extending by analogy to the rest; (c) conclusion; (d) clarifying the conventional characteristic; b. clarifying discourse of being free from this and that, which has five parts: (a) general statement, (b) briefly clarifying being free, (c) listing the names, (d) separate explanation, which has three parts as in the treatise, (e) general conclusion; c. clarifying discourse of common societal designation, which has three parts: (a) statement and explanation, (b) listing the names, (c) explanation, which has six parts as in the treatise; d. clarifying discourse of the aggregation of multiple dharmas, which has two parts: (a) statement and explanation, (b) clarifying the correct meaning, which has two parts: 1) clarifying conventional dharmas relying on the internal, 2) clarifying conventional dharmas relying on the external; e. clarifying discourse of not being all-pervading, which has two parts: (a) statement and explanation, (b) clarifying the correct meaning, which has four parts as in the treatise; f. clarifying discourse of the impermanent, which has four parts: (a) brief statement and explanation, (b) listing the names, (c) explanation, which has four parts as in the treatise, (d) conclusion; and (vi) clarifying the general conclusion; [iv] clarifying entities existent by causal characteristic, which has five parts: (i) general question; (ii) brief answer; (iii) listing the names; (iv) explanation, which has five parts as in the treatise; (v) general conclusion; [v] clarifying entities existent by resultant characteristic, which has three parts: (i) question; (ii) answer, which has five parts as in the treatise; (iii) conclusion. The second [part], explaining non-existent entities, has four parts: [a] general question; [b] brief answer; [c] listing the names; [d] explanation, which has five parts as in the treatise.