瑜伽師地論分門記 2.181

2.181

第三依比量明觀滅壞行無常性分二　一比度現見滅壞無常分八。一明生起。二徵問。三答正義分三。一成立生滅義。二成立自然滅壞義分三。一立因。二顯果。三答難。四徵。五答所以。六立喻。七破喻成因。八總結　二比度他世滅壞無常分六。一明生起。二總問。三答正義分三。一標。二釋分七如論。三結。四徵。五廣答所以分三。一立宗。二破分三。一破俱生見。二破先後見。三破所欲等三法為因見。三總結。六總結分二。一標。二釋分三如論。

Third, relying on inference (anumāna) to explain the observation of the impermanent nature of the aspect of destruction, which has two [sections]: 1. inferring the presently visible impermanence of destruction, having eight [parts]: (1) explaining the arising; (2) probing question; (3) answering with the correct meaning, which has three [subdivisions]: a. establishing the meaning of arising and ceasing, b. establishing the meaning of spontaneous destruction, which has three [points]: (a) establishing the cause, (b) showing the effect, (c) answering objections; (4) probe; (5) answering the reason; (6) establishing an analogy; (7) refuting the analogy to establish the cause; (8) general conclusion; 2. inferring the impermanence of destruction in other lifetimes, having six [parts]: (1) explaining the arising; (2) general question; (3) answering with the correct meaning, which has three [subdivisions]: a. statement, b. explanation, having seven [points] as in the treatise, c. conclusion; (4) probe; (5) extensive answer of the reason, which has three [subdivisions]: a. establishing the thesis, b. refutation, which has three [points]: (a) refuting the view of simultaneous arising, (b) refuting the view of succession, (c) refuting the view that the three factors such as desire are the cause; c. general conclusion; (6) general conclusion, having two [subdivisions]: a. statement, b. explanation, having three [points] as in the treatise.