瑜伽師地論分門記 6.192

6.192

分十一中第二明諸界四句差別善巧相分二。一總問分二如論。二廣答分二　一答四句差別分二。一略答。二別釋分四。一明有眼非眼界句分三。一標。二釋。三結。二明有眼界非眼句分三。一標。二釋分五如論。三結。三明有眼亦眼界句分三。一標。二釋。三結。四明非眼非眼界句分三。一標。二釋分四如論。三結　第二分別差別之義分二。一例分別內餘四界差別分二。一總標。二別釋差別。二例分別外界差別分二。一總標。二別釋差別分二如論。

Within the eleven divisions, the second, explaining the characteristics of kauśalya regarding the fourfold distinction among the dhātus, has two parts: 1. a general inquiry, having two parts as in the treatise; 2. a detailed answer, having two parts: (1) answering the fourfold distinction, having two parts: a. a brief answer, b. an individual explanation, having four parts: i. explaining the alternative "there is the eye, but not the eye-dhātu", having three parts: identification, explanation, conclusion; ii. explaining the alternative "there is the eye-dhātu, but not the eye", having three parts: identification, explanation (having five parts as in the treatise), conclusion; iii. explaining the alternative "there is both the eye and the eye-dhātu", having three parts: identification, explanation, conclusion; iv. explaining the alternative "there is neither the eye nor the eye-dhātu", having three parts: identification, explanation (having four parts as in the treatise), conclusion; (2) differentiating the distinctive meanings, having two parts: a. differentiating the distinctions of the remaining four internal dhātus by analogy, having two parts: a general presentation, and an individual explanation of the distinctions; b. differentiating the distinctions of the external dhātus by analogy, having two parts: a general presentation, and an individual explanation of the distinctions (having two parts as in the treatise).