瑜伽師地論分門記 6.48

6.48

大門分五中第二破邪計品分三　一破計火等為滅因見分二。一破計火等是滅壞因分四。一立彼計。二徵。三答所以。四結。二破執壞滅是壞滅因見分三。一立彼計。二徵。三答所以分二如論　第二破計滅相為滅因見分四。一破自性滅壞為因見分二。一立。二破。二破別有滅壞因見分二。一立。二破。三破計火等為滅助伴方能滅見分二。一立。二破。四破別有功能見分二。一立。二破　第三破謂二種於一處所有滅功能見分二。一立。二破。

Within the main section's division into five, the second, the section refuting deviant imputations, is divided into three: [1] refuting the view that imputes fire and so forth as causes of cessation, divided into two: [a] refuting the imputation that fire and so forth are causes of destruction, divided into four: <i> establishing their imputation; <ii> query; <iii> answering the reason; and <iv> conclusion; and [b] refuting the view that holds destruction itself to be the cause of destruction, divided into three: <i> establishing their imputation; <ii> query; and <iii> answering the reason, divided into two, as in the treatise; [2] refuting the view that imputes the characteristic of cessation as the cause of cessation, divided into four: [a] refuting the view of cessation by intrinsic nature being the cause, divided into two: <i> establishing, and <ii> refuting; [b] refuting the view of there being a separate cause of destruction, divided into two: <i> establishing, and <ii> refuting; [c] refuting the view that imputes fire and so forth as auxiliary conditions of cessation for cessation to occur, divided into two: <i> establishing, and <ii> refuting; and [d] refuting the view of there being a separate functional capacity, divided into two: <i> establishing, and <ii> refuting; and [3] refuting the view that two things in one locus possess the functional capacity of cessation, divided into two: [a] establishing, and [b] refuting.