大乘百法明門論開宗義決 1.36

1.36

世出世法皆非實等者。問。此與大乘義有何別答。由執諸法定是假立。不同大乘假實雙泯。但說諸法皆假非實。不說諸法非實之因。不同應理一切諸法皆從心生。又殊勝義空。由勝義故諸法非有。故與大乘有差別也。

Regarding "both worldly and transworldly dharmas are non-real," etc.: Question: What difference is there between this and the Mahāyāna doctrine? Answer: Because they cling to all dharmas as definitely being conventionally posited. It is unlike Mahāyāna, wherein both nominal and real are extinguished; they merely say that all dharmas are conventional and not real, without stating the cause of dharmas being non-real. It is unlike the correct principle that all dharmas are produced from mind. Moreover, it differs from the emptiness of ultimate truth, [in which] dharmas do not exist by virtue of the ultimate truth. Therefore, there is a difference from Mahāyāna.