大乘起信論略述 1.111

1.111

論。二者能見至則無見　述曰。能見相者。標其名也。此言能見。即下轉相依前業識轉成能見。故言以依動故能見。若性淨門則無能見。故云不動則無見也。反顯能見必依動義。如是轉相雖有能緣尚未取境。以微細故即是本識見分心也。

[Treatise:] Second is the mark of being able to see... then there is no seeing.
[Commentary:] “The mark of being able to see” gives its name. This mention of “being able to see” is the “transforming consciousness” below; relying on the preceding activity consciousness, it transforms into that which is able to see. Hence it says, “Because it relies on movement, it is able to see.” If one considers the aspect of natural purity, there is no ability to see; hence it says, “if it is unmoving, then there is no seeing.” This conversely reveals the meaning that being able to see must rely on movement. Although such a transforming mark has that which can cognize, it has not yet grasped an object; because it is subtle, it is the seeing division of the fundamental consciousness.