Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

Kathavatthu 6.4: Āruppakathā

Kathāvatthu 6.4

Language
Pāli

Contents

Āruppakathā

6.4.1.1

Ākāsānañcāyatanaṃ asaṅkhatanti?

“Is the base of boundless space unconditioned?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Controverted Point: That the sphere of infinite space is unconditioned.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.1.2

Āmantā.

“Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Controverted Point: That the sphere of infinite space is unconditioned.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.1.3

Nibbānaṃ tāṇaṃ leṇaṃ saraṇaṃ parāyanaṃ accutaṃ amatanti?

“Is it unbinding, a shelter, a refuge, a protection, the ultimate goal, imperishable, the deathless?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: Are you implying that it is in this respect identical with Nibbāna, the Shelter, the Cave, the Refuge, the Goal, the Past-Decease, the Ambrosial? You deny … Then you cannot so class it. If you affirm, we may then have two Unconditioneds, two Nibbānas … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.1.4

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…

“It should not be said thus …pe…

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: Are you implying that it is in this respect identical with Nibbāna, the Shelter, the Cave, the Refuge, the Goal, the Past-Decease, the Ambrosial? You deny … Then you cannot so class it. If you affirm, we may then have two Unconditioneds, two Nibbānas … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.1.5

ākāsānañcāyatanaṃ asaṅkhataṃ, nibbānaṃ asaṅkhatanti?

is the base of boundless space unconditioned, and unbinding unconditioned?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: Are you implying that it is in this respect identical with Nibbāna, the Shelter, the Cave, the Refuge, the Goal, the Past-Decease, the Ambrosial? You deny … Then you cannot so class it. If you affirm, we may then have two Unconditioneds, two Nibbānas … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.1.6

Āmantā.

“Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: Are you implying that it is in this respect identical with Nibbāna, the Shelter, the Cave, the Refuge, the Goal, the Past-Decease, the Ambrosial? You deny … Then you cannot so class it. If you affirm, we may then have two Unconditioneds, two Nibbānas … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.1.7

Dve asaṅkhatānīti?

“Are there two unconditioned [realities]?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: Are you implying that it is in this respect identical with Nibbāna, the Shelter, the Cave, the Refuge, the Goal, the Past-Decease, the Ambrosial? You deny … Then you cannot so class it. If you affirm, we may then have two Unconditioneds, two Nibbānas … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.1.8

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…

“It should not be said thus …pe…

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: Are you implying that it is in this respect identical with Nibbāna, the Shelter, the Cave, the Refuge, the Goal, the Past-Decease, the Ambrosial? You deny … Then you cannot so class it. If you affirm, we may then have two Unconditioneds, two Nibbānas … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.1.9

dve asaṅkhatānīti?

are there two unconditioned [realities]?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: Are you implying that it is in this respect identical with Nibbāna, the Shelter, the Cave, the Refuge, the Goal, the Past-Decease, the Ambrosial? You deny … Then you cannot so class it. If you affirm, we may then have two Unconditioneds, two Nibbānas … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.1.10

Āmantā.

“Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: Are you implying that it is in this respect identical with Nibbāna, the Shelter, the Cave, the Refuge, the Goal, the Past-Decease, the Ambrosial? You deny … Then you cannot so class it. If you affirm, we may then have two Unconditioneds, two Nibbānas … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.1.11

Dve tāṇāni …pe…

“Are there two shelters …pe…

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: Are you implying that it is in this respect identical with Nibbāna, the Shelter, the Cave, the Refuge, the Goal, the Past-Decease, the Ambrosial? You deny … Then you cannot so class it. If you affirm, we may then have two Unconditioneds, two Nibbānas … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.1.12

antarikā vāti?

or a gap [between them]?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: Are you implying that it is in this respect identical with Nibbāna, the Shelter, the Cave, the Refuge, the Goal, the Past-Decease, the Ambrosial? You deny … Then you cannot so class it. If you affirm, we may then have two Unconditioneds, two Nibbānas … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.1.13

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe….

“It should not be said thus …pe….

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: Are you implying that it is in this respect identical with Nibbāna, the Shelter, the Cave, the Refuge, the Goal, the Past-Decease, the Ambrosial? You deny … Then you cannot so class it. If you affirm, we may then have two Unconditioneds, two Nibbānas … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.2.1

Ākāsānañcāyatanaṃ asaṅkhatanti?

“Is the base of boundless space unconditioned?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

You admit, do you not, that the sphere of infinite space is a form of rebirth, a destination, an abode of beings, a sequel in living, a matrix of birth, a station for reborn consciousness, an acquiring of individuality? Then is the unconditioned to be so described? Of course not … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.2.2

Āmantā.

“Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

You admit, do you not, that the sphere of infinite space is a form of rebirth, a destination, an abode of beings, a sequel in living, a matrix of birth, a station for reborn consciousness, an acquiring of individuality? Then is the unconditioned to be so described? Of course not … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.2.3

Ākāsānañcāyatanaṃ bhavo gati sattāvāso saṃsāro yoni viññāṇaṭṭhiti attabhāvapaṭilābhoti?

“Is the base of boundless space an existence, a destination, an abode of beings, saṃsāra, a place of birth, a station of consciousness, an acquisition of an individual state?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

You admit, do you not, that the sphere of infinite space is a form of rebirth, a destination, an abode of beings, a sequel in living, a matrix of birth, a station for reborn consciousness, an acquiring of individuality? Then is the unconditioned to be so described? Of course not … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.2.4

Āmantā.

“Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

You admit, do you not, that the sphere of infinite space is a form of rebirth, a destination, an abode of beings, a sequel in living, a matrix of birth, a station for reborn consciousness, an acquiring of individuality? Then is the unconditioned to be so described? Of course not … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.2.5

Asaṅkhataṃ bhavo gati sattāvāso saṃsāro yoni viññāṇaṭṭhiti attabhāvapaṭilābhoti?

“Is the unconditioned an existence, a destination, an abode of beings, saṃsāra, a place of birth, a station of consciousness, an acquisition of an individual state?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

You admit, do you not, that the sphere of infinite space is a form of rebirth, a destination, an abode of beings, a sequel in living, a matrix of birth, a station for reborn consciousness, an acquiring of individuality? Then is the unconditioned to be so described? Of course not … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.2.6

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe….

“It should not be said thus …pe….

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

You admit, do you not, that the sphere of infinite space is a form of rebirth, a destination, an abode of beings, a sequel in living, a matrix of birth, a station for reborn consciousness, an acquiring of individuality? Then is the unconditioned to be so described? Of course not … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.3.1

Atthi ākāsānañcāyatanūpagaṃ kammanti?

“Is there kamma leading to the base of boundless space?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Is there karma which brings us to rebirth in that sphere? “Yes”, you say. Then is there karma which brings about rebirth in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … There are beings who for their deserts are reborn in that sphere of infinite space, but are there any who for their deserts are reborn in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.3.2

Āmantā.

“Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Is there karma which brings us to rebirth in that sphere? “Yes”, you say. Then is there karma which brings about rebirth in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … There are beings who for their deserts are reborn in that sphere of infinite space, but are there any who for their deserts are reborn in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.3.3

Atthi asaṅkhatūpagaṃ kammanti?

“Is there kamma leading to the unconditioned?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Is there karma which brings us to rebirth in that sphere? “Yes”, you say. Then is there karma which brings about rebirth in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … There are beings who for their deserts are reborn in that sphere of infinite space, but are there any who for their deserts are reborn in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.3.4

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…

“It should not be said thus …pe…

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Is there karma which brings us to rebirth in that sphere? “Yes”, you say. Then is there karma which brings about rebirth in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … There are beings who for their deserts are reborn in that sphere of infinite space, but are there any who for their deserts are reborn in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.3.5

atthi ākāsānañcāyatanūpagā sattāti?

are there beings who go to the base of boundless space?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Is there karma which brings us to rebirth in that sphere? “Yes”, you say. Then is there karma which brings about rebirth in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … There are beings who for their deserts are reborn in that sphere of infinite space, but are there any who for their deserts are reborn in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.3.6

Āmantā.

“Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Is there karma which brings us to rebirth in that sphere? “Yes”, you say. Then is there karma which brings about rebirth in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … There are beings who for their deserts are reborn in that sphere of infinite space, but are there any who for their deserts are reborn in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.3.7

Atthi asaṅkhatūpagā sattāti?

“Are there beings who go to the unconditioned?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Is there karma which brings us to rebirth in that sphere? “Yes”, you say. Then is there karma which brings about rebirth in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … There are beings who for their deserts are reborn in that sphere of infinite space, but are there any who for their deserts are reborn in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.3.8

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe….

“It should not be said thus …pe….

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Is there karma which brings us to rebirth in that sphere? “Yes”, you say. Then is there karma which brings about rebirth in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … There are beings who for their deserts are reborn in that sphere of infinite space, but are there any who for their deserts are reborn in the unconditioned? Of course you deny … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.4.1

Ākāsānañcāyatane sattā jāyanti jīyanti mīyanti cavanti upapajjantīti?

“In the base of boundless space, are beings born, do they age, do they die, do they pass away, do they reappear?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Do any beings become born, decay, die, decease, and spring up again in that sphere? Yes? But surely not in the unconditioned … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.4.2

Āmantā.

“Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Do any beings become born, decay, die, decease, and spring up again in that sphere? Yes? But surely not in the unconditioned … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.4.3

Asaṅkhate sattā jāyanti jīyanti mīyanti cavanti upapajjantīti?

“In the unconditioned, are beings born, do they age, do they die, do they pass away, do they reappear?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Do any beings become born, decay, die, decease, and spring up again in that sphere? Yes? But surely not in the unconditioned … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.4.4

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…

“It should not be said thus …pe…

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Do any beings become born, decay, die, decease, and spring up again in that sphere? Yes? But surely not in the unconditioned … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.4.5

ākāsānañcāyatane atthi vedanā saññā saṅkhārā viññāṇanti?

in the base of boundless space, is there feeling, perception, volitional formations, consciousness?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does mind in its four constituents exist in that sphere? Yes? But hardly in the unconditioned … You cannot call the latter a plane of life with four constituents, as is the former.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.4.6

Āmantā.

“Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does mind in its four constituents exist in that sphere? Yes? But hardly in the unconditioned … You cannot call the latter a plane of life with four constituents, as is the former.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.4.7

Asaṅkhate atthi vedanā saññā saṅkhārā viññāṇanti?

“In the unconditioned, is there feeling, perception, volitional formations, consciousness?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does mind in its four constituents exist in that sphere? Yes? But hardly in the unconditioned … You cannot call the latter a plane of life with four constituents, as is the former.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.4.8

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…

“It should not be said thus …pe…

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does mind in its four constituents exist in that sphere? Yes? But hardly in the unconditioned … You cannot call the latter a plane of life with four constituents, as is the former.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.4.9

ākāsānañcāyatanaṃ catuvokārabhavoti?

is the base of boundless space an existence with four aggregates?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does mind in its four constituents exist in that sphere? Yes? But hardly in the unconditioned … You cannot call the latter a plane of life with four constituents, as is the former.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.4.10

Āmantā.

“Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does mind in its four constituents exist in that sphere? Yes? But hardly in the unconditioned … You cannot call the latter a plane of life with four constituents, as is the former.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.4.11

Asaṅkhataṃ catuvokārabhavoti?

“Is the unconditioned an existence with four aggregates?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does mind in its four constituents exist in that sphere? Yes? But hardly in the unconditioned … You cannot call the latter a plane of life with four constituents, as is the former.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.4.12

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe….

“It should not be said thus …pe….

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does mind in its four constituents exist in that sphere? Yes? But hardly in the unconditioned … You cannot call the latter a plane of life with four constituents, as is the former.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.5.1

Na vattabbaṃ—

“Should it not be said that

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Opponent: But did not the Exalted One say that the four Immaterial spheres are imperturbable? Surely then we may call them unconditioned.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.5.2

“cattāro āruppā asaṅkhatā”ti?

‘the four formless [attainments] are unconditioned’?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Opponent: But did not the Exalted One say that the four Immaterial spheres are imperturbable? Surely then we may call them unconditioned.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.5.3

Āmantā.

“Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Opponent: But did not the Exalted One say that the four Immaterial spheres are imperturbable? Surely then we may call them unconditioned.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.5.4

Nanu cattāro āruppā anejā vuttā bhagavatāti?

“Were not the four formless [attainments] declared to be imperturbable by the Blessed One?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Opponent: But did not the Exalted One say that the four Immaterial spheres are imperturbable? Surely then we may call them unconditioned.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.5.5

Āmantā.

“Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Opponent: But did not the Exalted One say that the four Immaterial spheres are imperturbable? Surely then we may call them unconditioned.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.5.6

Hañci cattāro āruppā anejā vuttā bhagavatā, tena vata re vattabbe—

“If the four formless [attainments] were declared to be imperturbable by the Blessed One, then indeed, sir, it should be said:

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Opponent: But did not the Exalted One say that the four Immaterial spheres are imperturbable? Surely then we may call them unconditioned.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.5.7

“cattāro āruppā asaṅkhatā”ti.

‘The four formless [attainments] are unconditioned.’”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Opponent: But did not the Exalted One say that the four Immaterial spheres are imperturbable? Surely then we may call them unconditioned.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

6.4.5.8

Āruppakathā niṭṭhitā.

Discussion on the Formless is finished.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (2)

Commentaries (2)

Discussed in (2)