Sarvadarshanasangraha 2.25

2.25

(A) na cen nāpekṣaṇīyās te/ akiṃcitkurvatāṃ teṣāṃ tādarthyāyogāt/ [atha bhāvas taiḥ sahakāribhiḥ sahaiva kāryaṃ karotīti svabhāva iti cet/

You will perhaps rejoin: By assuming successive subsidiaries, there is competent to the permanent entity a successive exertion of past and future practical efficiency. If so, we would ask you to explain: Do the subsidiaries assist the entity or not? If they do not, they are not required; for if they do nothing, they can have nothing to do with the successive exertion. If they do assist the thing, is this assistance (or supplementation) other than the thing or not? If it is other than the thing, then this adscititious (assistance) is the cause, and the non-momentary entity is not the cause: for the effect will then follow, by concomitance and non-concomitance, the adventitious supplementation. Thus it has been said: