Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

Viyahapannatti 12.10.560-561

Viyāhapannatti 12.10.560-561

Language
Ardhamāgadhī Prakrit

12.10.560

kativihā ṇaṃ bhaṃte! āyā pannattā?
goyamā! aṭṭhavihā āyā pannattā, taṃ jahā–daviyāyā, kasāyāyā, jogāyā, uvaogāyā, nāṇāyā, daṃsaṇāyā, carittāyā, vīriyāyā|
jassa ṇaṃ bhaṃte! daviyāyā tassa kasāyāyā? jassa kasāyāyā tassa daviyāyā?
goyamā! jassa daviyāyā tassa kasāyāyā siya atthi siya natthi, jassa puṇa kasāyāyā tassa daviyāyā niyamaṃ atthi|
jassa ṇaṃ bhaṃte! daviyāyā tassa jogāyā? jassa jogāyā tassa daviyāyā?
goyamā! jassa daviyāyā tassa jogāyā siya atthi siya natthi, jassa puṇa jogāyā tassa daviyāyā niyamaṃ atthi|
jassa ṇaṃ bhaṃte! daviyāyā tassa uvaogāyā? jassa uvaogāyā tassa daviyāyā? –evaṃ savvattha pucchā bhāṇiyavvā|
goyamā! jassa daviyāyā tassa uvaogāyā niyamaṃ atthi| jassa vi uvaogāyā tassa vi daviyāyā niyamaṃ atthi| jassa daviyāyā tassa nāṇāyā bhayaṇāe| jassa puṇa nāṇāyā tassa daviyāyā niyamaṃ atthi| jassa daviyāyā tassa daṃsaṇāyā niyamaṃ atthi| jassa vi daṃsaṇāyā tassa vi daviyāyā niyamaṃ atthi| jassa daviyāyā tassa carittāyā bhayaṇāe, jassa puṇa carittāyā tassa daviyāyā niyamaṃ atthi| jassa daviyāyā tassa vīriyāyā bhayaṇāe, jassa puṇa vīriyāyā tassa daviyāyā niyamaṃ atthi|
jassa ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kasāyāyā tassa jogāyā–pucchā|
goyamā! jassa kasāyāyā tassa jogāyā niyamaṃ atthi, jassa puṇa jogāyā tassa kasāyāyā siya atthi siya natthi| evaṃ uvaogāyāe vi samaṃ kasāyāyā neyavvā| kasāyāyā ya nāṇāyā ya paropparaṃ do vi bhaiyavvāo| jahā kasāyāyā ya uvaogāyā ya tahā kasāyāyā ya daṃsaṇāyā ya, kasāyāyā ya carittāyā ya do vi paropparaṃ bhaiyavvāo| jahā kasāyāyā ya jogāyā ya tahā kasāyāyā ya vīriyāyā ya bhāṇiyavvāo| evaṃ jahā kasāyāyāe vattavvayā bhaṇiyā tahā jogāyāe vi uvarimāhiṃ samaṃ bhāṇiyavvāo|
jahā daviyāyāe vattavvayā bhaṇiyā tahā uvaogāyāe vi uvarillāhiṃ samaṃ bhāṇiyavvā| jassa nāṇāyā tassa daṃsaṇāyā niyamaṃ atthi, jassa puṇa daṃsaṇāyā tassa nāṇāyā bhayaṇāe| jassa nāṇāyā tassa carittāyā siya atthi siya natthi, jassa puṇa carittāyā tassa nāṇāyā niyamaṃ atthi| nāṇāyā vīriyāyā do vi paropparaṃ bhayaṇāe| jassa daṃsaṇāyā tassa uvarimāo do vi bhayaṇāe, jassa puṇa tāo tassa daṃsaṇāyā niyamaṃ atthi| jassa puṇa carittāyā tassa vīriyāyā niyamaṃ atthi, jassa puṇa vīriyāyā tassa carittāyā siya atthi siya natthi|
eyāsi ṇaṃ bhaṃte! daviyāyāṇaṃ, kasāyāyāṇaṃ jāva vīriyāyāṇaṃ ya kayare kayarehiṃto appā vā? bahuyā vā? tullā vā? visesāhiyā vā?
goyamā! savvatthovāo carittāyāo, nāṇāyāo anaṃtaguṇāo, kasāyāyāo anaṃtaguṇāo, jogāyāo visesāhiyāo, vīriyāyāo visesāhiyāo, uvaogadaviya-daṃsaṇāyāo tinni vi tullāo visesāhiyāo|

“How many kinds of soul (ātmā), Venerable Sir, have been expounded?”
“Gautama, eight kinds of soul have been expounded, namely: the substance-soul (dravyātmā), the passion-soul (kaṣāyātmā), the activity-soul (yogātmā), the application-soul (upayogātmā), the knowledge-soul (jñānātmā), the intuition-soul (darśanātmā), the conduct-soul (cāritrātmā), and the energy-soul (vīryātmā).

If one has the substance-soul, Venerable Sir, does one have the passion-soul? If one has the passion-soul, does one have the substance-soul?”
“Gautama, one who has the substance-soul may or may not have the passion-soul; but one who has the passion-soul necessarily has the substance-soul.”

“If one has the substance-soul, Venerable Sir, does one have the activity-soul? If one has the activity-soul, does one have the substance-soul?”
“Gautama, one who has the substance-soul may or may not have the activity-soul; but one who has the activity-soul necessarily has the substance-soul.”

“If one has the substance-soul, Venerable Sir, does one have the application-soul? If one has the application-soul, does one have the substance-soul?”—thus the question is to be stated in all cases.
“Gautama, one who has the substance-soul necessarily has the application-soul; one who has the application-soul also necessarily has the substance-soul. For one who has the substance-soul, having the knowledge-soul is optional (bhajanāt); but one who has the knowledge-soul necessarily has the substance-soul. One who has the substance-soul necessarily has the intuition-soul; one who has the intuition-soul also necessarily has the substance-soul. For one who has the substance-soul, having the conduct-soul is optional; but one who has the conduct-soul necessarily has the substance-soul. For one who has the substance-soul, having the energy-soul is optional; but one who has the energy-soul necessarily has the substance-soul.

If one has the passion-soul, Venerable Sir, does one have the activity-soul?—[such is the] question.”
“Gautama, one who has the passion-soul necessarily has the activity-soul; but one who has the activity-soul may or may not have the passion-soul. In this manner, the passion-soul is to be understood in conjunction with the application-soul as well. Between the passion-soul and the knowledge-soul, both are mutually optional. As between the passion-soul and the application-soul, so between the passion-soul and the intuition-soul; the passion-soul and the conduct-soul are both mutually optional. As between the passion-soul and the activity-soul, so it is to be stated between the passion-soul and the energy-soul. Thus, as the account has been stated regarding the passion-soul, so it is to be stated regarding the activity-soul in conjunction with those that follow.

As the account has been stated regarding the substance-soul, so it is to be stated regarding the application-soul in conjunction with those that follow. One who has the knowledge-soul necessarily has the intuition-soul; but for one who has the intuition-soul, having the knowledge-soul is optional. One who has the knowledge-soul may or may not have the conduct-soul; but one who has the conduct-soul necessarily has the knowledge-soul. The knowledge-soul and the energy-soul are both mutually optional. For one who has the intuition-soul, the subsequent two are optional; but one who has those [subsequent two] necessarily has the intuition-soul. One who has the conduct-soul necessarily has the energy-soul; but one who has the energy-soul may or may not have the conduct-soul.

Among these substance-souls, passion-souls, up to energy-souls, Venerable Sir, which are fewer, more, equal, or especially more relative to which?”
“Gautama, the fewest of all are the conduct-souls; the knowledge-souls are infinitely times more; the passion-souls are infinitely times more; the activity-souls are especially more; the energy-souls are especially more; the application-souls, substance-souls, and intuition-souls are all three equal and especially more.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

12.10.561

āyā bhaṃte! nāṇe? anne nāṇe?
goyamā! āyā siya nāṇe siya annāṇe, nāṇe puṇa niyamaṃ āyā|
āyā bhaṃte! neraiyāṇaṃ nāṇe? anne neraiyāṇaṃ nāṇe?
goyamā! āyā neraiyāṇaṃ siya nāṇe, siya annāṇe| nāṇe puṇa se niyamaṃ āyā| evaṃ jāva thaṇiyakumārāṇaṃ|
āyā bhaṃte! puḍhavikāiyāṇaṃ annāṇe? anne puḍhavikāiyāṇaṃ annāṇe?
goyamā! āyā puḍhavikāiyāṇaṃ niyamaṃ annāṇe, annāṇe vi niyamaṃ āyā| evaṃ jāva vaṇassaikāiyāṇaṃ| beiṃdiya-teiṃdiyāṇaṃ jāva vemāṇiyāṇaṃ jahā neraiyāṇaṃ|
āyā bhaṃte! daṃsaṇe? anne daṃsaṇe?
goyamā! āyā niyamaṃ daṃsaṇe, daṃsaṇe vi niyamaṃ āyā|
āyā bhaṃte! neraiyāṇaṃ daṃsaṇe? anne neraiyāṇaṃ daṃsaṇe?
goyamā! āyā neraiyāṇaṃ niyamaṃ daṃsaṇe, daṃsaṇe vi se niyamaṃ āyā| evaṃ jāva vemāṇiyāṇaṃ niraṃtaraṃ daṃḍao|

“Is the soul, Venerable Sir, knowledge? Or is it not knowledge (ajñāna)?”
“Gautama, the soul is sometimes knowledge, sometimes not knowledge; but knowledge is necessarily the soul.”

“Is the soul of the inhabitants of hell, Venerable Sir, knowledge? Or is it not knowledge?”
“Gautama, the soul of the inhabitants of hell is sometimes knowledge, sometimes not knowledge; but their knowledge is necessarily the soul. In this manner [for all], up to the Stanitakumāras.

Is the soul of the earth-bodied beings, Venerable Sir, not knowledge? Or is it [other than] not knowledge?”
“Gautama, the soul of the earth-bodied beings is necessarily not knowledge, and [their] not knowledge is also necessarily the soul. In this manner [for all], up to the plant-bodied beings. For the two-sensed and three-sensed beings, up to the Vaimānikas, it is as with the inhabitants of hell.

Is the soul, Venerable Sir, intuition? Or is it other [than intuition]?”
“Gautama, the soul is necessarily intuition, and intuition is also necessarily the soul.”

“Is the soul of the inhabitants of hell, Venerable Sir, intuition? Or is it other [than intuition]?”
“Gautama, the soul of the inhabitants of hell is necessarily intuition, and their intuition is also necessarily the soul. In this manner [it applies] uninterruptedly throughout the twenty-four classes of beings (daṇḍaka) up to the Vaimānikas.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (3)

Commentaries (3)