Viyahapannatti 25.7.942-943

“Venerable Sir! Would a sāmāyika-restrained [ascetic] have sex-drive or be free of sex-drive?”
“Gautama! He may have sex-drive, or he may be free of sex-drive. If he has sex-drive, [it should be stated] exactly as for the kasāya-kusīla, completely without remainder. So also for the chedopasthāpanīya-restrained. The parihāraviśuddhi-restrained is like the pulāka. The sūkṣmasaṃparāya-restrained and the yathākhyāta-restrained are like the nirgrantha.
“Venerable Sir! Would a sāmāyika-restrained [ascetic] have passion or be free of passion?”
“Gautama! He would have passion, he would not be free of passion. So on up to the sūkṣmasaṃparāya-restrained. The yathākhyāta-restrained is like the nirgrantha.
“Venerable Sir! Would a sāmāyika-restrained [ascetic] be subject to fixed rules or not subject to fixed rules?”
“Gautama! He may be subject to fixed rules, or he may not be subject to fixed rules.
Regarding the chedopasthāpanīya-restrained—” [the question].
“Gautama! He would be subject to fixed rules, not non-subject to fixed rules. So also the parihāraviśuddhi-restrained. The rest are like the sāmāyika-restrained.
“Venerable Sir! Would a sāmāyika-restrained [ascetic] follow the Jina practice, follow the elder practice, or transcend practice?”
“Gautama! He may follow the Jina practice—[it is] exactly as for the kasāya-kusīla, entirely without remainder. The chedopasthāpanīya and the parihāraviśuddhi are like the bakuśa. The rest are like the nirgrantha.”

"Venerable Sir! Could one who possesses sāmāyika-restraint be a pulāka, a bakuśa, up to a snātaka?"
"Gautama! He could be a pulāka, or a bakuśa, up to a kaṣāyakuśīla; he could not be a nirgrantha, nor could he be a snātaka. Likewise also one who possesses chedopasthāpanīya-restraint."
[As for] one who possesses parihāraviśuddhika-restraint—the question.
"Gautama! He could not be a pulāka, nor a bakuśa, nor a pratisevanākuśīla; he could be a kaṣāyakuśīla; he could not be a nirgrantha, nor could he be a snātaka. Likewise also one who possesses sūkṣmasamparāya-restraint."
[As for] one who possesses yathākhyāta-restraint—the question.
"Gautama! He could not be a pulāka, up to he could not be a kaṣāyakuśīla; he could be a nirgrantha, or he could be a snātaka."
"Venerable Sir! Could one who possesses sāmāyika-restraint be a transgressor (pratisevaka) or a non-transgressor (apratisevaka)?"
"Gautama! He could be a transgressor, or he could be a non-transgressor. If he could be a transgressor: could he be a transgressor of primary virtues? The rest is as for pulāka. As for one who possesses sāmāyika-restraint, likewise also one who possesses chedopasthāpanīya-restraint."
[As for] one who possesses parihāraviśuddhika-restraint—the question.
"Gautama! He could not be a transgressor; he could be a non-transgressor. Likewise up to one who possesses yathākhyāta-restraint."
"Venerable Sir! In how many knowledges could one who possesses sāmāyika-restraint be?"
"Gautama! He could be in two, or three, or four knowledges. As was stated for kaṣāyakuśīla, exactly so the four knowledges are optional. Likewise up to one who possesses sūkṣmasamparāya-restraint. For one who possesses yathākhyāta-restraint, the five knowledges are optional, as in the chapter on knowledge."
"Venerable Sir! How much śruta may one who possesses sāmāyika-restraint study?"
"Gautama! At a minimum, the eight pravacanamātās, as [stated for] kaṣāyakuśīla. Likewise also one who possesses chedopasthāpanīya-restraint."
[As for] one who possesses parihāraviśuddhika-restraint—the question.
"Gautama! At a minimum, the third Ācāravastu of the ninth Pūrva; at a maximum, he may study ten incomplete Pūrvas. One who possesses sūkṣmasamparāya-restraint is like one who possesses sāmāyika-restraint."
[As for] one who possesses yathākhyāta-restraint—the question.
"Gautama! At a minimum, the eight pravacanamātās; at a maximum, he may study the fourteen Pūrvas, or he may transcend śruta."
"Venerable Sir! Could one who possesses sāmāyika-restraint be in a tīrtha or in a non-tīrtha?"
"Gautama! He could be in a tīrtha, or he could be in a non-tīrtha, as [stated for] kaṣāyakuśīla. One who possesses chedopasthāpanīya-restraint and one who possesses parihāraviśuddhika-restraint are like pulāka. The rest are like one who possesses sāmāyika-restraint."
"Venerable Sir! Could one who possesses sāmāyika-restraint be in his own emblem, in another's emblem, or in a householder's emblem?"
"As [stated for] pulāka. Likewise also one who possesses chedopasthāpanīya-restraint."
"Venerable Sir! [As for] one who possesses parihāraviśuddhika-restraint—the question."
"Gautama! In terms of both physical emblem and mental emblem, he could be in his own emblem; he could not be in another's emblem, nor could he be in a householder's emblem. The rest are like one who possesses sāmāyika-restraint."
"Venerable Sir! In how many bodies could one who possesses sāmāyika-restraint be?"
"Gautama! In three, or four, or five, as [stated for] kaṣāyakuśīla. Likewise also one who possesses chedopasthāpanīya-restraint. The rest are like pulāka."
"Venerable Sir! Could one who possesses sāmāyika-restraint be in a karmabhūmi or in an akarmabhūmi?"
"Gautama! With respect to birth and actual presence, as [stated for] bakuśa. Likewise also one who possesses chedopasthāpanīya-restraint. And one who possesses parihāraviśuddhika-restraint is like pulāka. The rest are like one who possesses sāmāyika-restraint."