Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

Kautilya's Arthashastra 7.12: Chapter 12 (Section 116): Pacts for Securing an Ally, Money, Land and an Undertaking (cont.)

Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra 7.12

Language
Sanskrit

Chapter 12 (Section 116): Pacts for Securing an Ally, Money, Land and an Undertaking (cont.)

7.12.1

"tvaṃ cāhaṃ ca durgaṃ kārayāvahe" iti karmasaṃdhiḥ //

WHEN an agreement is made on the condition "Let us have a fort built," it is termed agreement for undertaking a work.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.2

tayor yo daivakṛtam aviṣahyam alpavyayārambhaṃ durgaṃ kārayati so 'tisaṃdhatte //

Whoever of the two kings builds an impregnable fortress on a spot naturally best fitted for the purpose with less labour and expenditure overreaches the other.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.3

tatrāpi sthalanadīparvatadurgāṇām uttarottaraṃ śreyaḥ //

Of forts such as a fort on a plain, in the centre of a river, and on a mountain, that which is mentioned later is of more advantage than the one previously mentioned; of irrigational works (setu-bandha), that which is of perennial water is better than that which is fed wit water drawn from other sources; and of works containing perennial water, that which can irrigate an extensive area is better.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.4

setubandhayor apy āhāryodakāt sahodakaḥ śreyān //

7.12.5

sahodakayor api prabhūtavāpasthānaḥ śreyān //

7.12.6

dravyavanayor api yo mahatsāravaddravyāṭavīkaṃ viṣayānte nadīmātṛkaṃ dravyavanaṃ chedayati so 'tisaṃdhatte //

Of timber forests, whoever plants a forest which produces valuable articles, which expands into wild tracts, and which possesses a river on its border overreaches the other, for a forest containing a river is self-dependent and can afford shelter in calamities.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.7

nadīmātṛkaṃ hi svājīvam apāśrayaś cāpadi bhavati //

7.12.8

hastivanayor api yo bahuśūramṛgaṃ durbalaprativeśaṃanantāvakleśi viṣayānte hastivanaṃ badhnāti so 'tisaṃdhatte //

Of game-forests, whoever plants a forest full of cruel beasts, close to an enemy's forest containing wild animals, causing therefore much harm to the enemy, and extending into an elephant-forest at the country's border, overreaches the other.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.9

tatrāpi "bahukuṇṭhālpaśūrayoḥ alpaśūraṃ śreyaḥ, śūreṣu hi yuddham, alpāḥ śūrā bahūn aśūrān bhañjanti, te bhagnāḥ svasainyāvaghātino bhavanti" ity ācāryāḥ //

My teacher says that of the two countries, one with a large number of effete persons, and another with a small number of brave persons, the latter is better inasmuch as, a few brave persons can destroy a large mass of effete persons whose slaughter brings about the destruction of the entire army of their master.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.10

neti kauṭilyaḥ //

Not so, says Kautilya, a large number of effete persons is better, inasmuch as they can be employed to do other kinds of works in the camp: to serve the soldiers fighting in battlefields, and to terrify the enemy by its number. It is also possible to infuse spirit and enthusiasm in the timid by means of discipline and training.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.11

kuṇṭhā bahavaḥ śreyāṃsaḥ, skandhaviniyogād anekaṃ karma kurvāṇāḥ sveṣām apāśrayo yuddhe, pareṣāṃ durdharṣā vibhīṣaṇāś ca //

7.12.12

bahuṣu hi kuṇṭheṣu vinayakarmaṇā śakyaṃ śauryam ādhātum, na tv evālpeṣu śūreṣu bahutvam iti //

7.12.13

khanyor api yaḥ prabhūtasārām adurgamārgām alpavyayārambhāṃ khaniṃ khānayati, so 'tisaṃdhatte //

Of mines, whoever exploits with less labour and expenditure a mine of valuable output and of easy communication overreaches the other.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.14

tatrāpi mahāsāram alpam alpasāraṃ vā prabhūtam iti "mahāsāram alpaṃ śreyaḥ, vajramaṇimuktāpravālahemarūpyadhātur hi prabhūtam alpasāram atyargheṇa grasate" ity ācāryāḥ //

Which is better of the two, a small mine of valuable yield, or a big mine productive of commodities of inferior value?

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

My teacher says that the former is better inasmuch as valuable products, such as diamonds, precious stones, pearls, corals, gold and silver, can swallow vast quantities of inferior commodities.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.15

neti kauṭilyaḥ //

Not so, says Kautilya, for there is the possibility of purchasing valuable commodities by a mass of accumulated articles of inferior value, collected from a vast and longstanding mine of inferior commodities.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.16

cirād alpo mahāsārasya kretā vidyate, prabhūtaḥ sātatyād alpasārasya //

7.12.17

etena vaṇikpatho vyākhyātaḥ //

This explains the selection of trade-routes:

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.18

tatrāpi "vāristhalapathayor vāripathaḥ śreyān, alpavyayavyāyāmaḥ prabhūtapaṇyodayaś ca" ity ācāryāḥ //

My teacher says that of the two trade-routes, one by water and another by land, the former is better, inasmuch as it is less expensive, but productive of large profit.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.19

neti kauṭilyaḥ //

Not so, says Kautilya, for water route is liable to obstruction, not permanent, a source of imminent dangers, and incapable of defence, whereas a land-route is of reverse nature.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.20

samruddhagatir asārvakālikaḥ prakṛṣṭabhayayonir niṣpratīkāraś ca vāripathaḥ, viparītaḥ sthalapathaḥ //

7.12.21

vāripathe tu kūlasamyānapathayoḥ kūlapathaḥ paṇyapattanabāhulyāt śreyān, nadīpatho vā, sātatyād viṣahyābādhatvāc ca //

Of water-routes, one along the shore and another in mid-ocean, the route along, and close to the shore is better, as it touches at many trading port-towns; likewise river navigation is better, as it is uninterrupted and is of avoidable or endurable dangers.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.22

sthalapathe 'pi "haimavato dakṣiṇāpathāt śreyān, hastyaśvagandhadantājinarūpyasuvarṇapaṇyāḥ sāravattarāḥ" ity ācāryāḥ" //

My teacher says that of land-routes, that which leads to the Himalayas is better than that which leads to the south.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.23

neti kauṭilyaḥ //

Not so, says Kautilya, for with the exception of blankets, skins, and horses, other articles of merchandise such as, conch-shells, diamonds, precious stones, pearls and gold are available in plenty in the south.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.24

kambalājināśvapaṇyavarjāḥ śaṅkhavajramaṇimuktāsuvarṇapaṇyāś ca prabhūtatarā dakṣiṇāpathe //

7.12.25

dakṣiṇāpathe 'pi bahukhaniḥ sārapaṇyaḥ prasiddhagatir alpavyayavyāyāmo vā vaṇikpathaḥ śreyān, prabhūtaviṣayo vā phalgupuṇyaḥ //

Of routes leading to the south, either that trade-route which traverses a large number of mines which is frequented by people, and which is less expensive or troublesome, or that route by taking which plenty of merchandise of various kinds can be obtained is better.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.26

tena pūrvaḥ paścimaś ca vaṇikpatho vyākhyātaḥ //

This explains the selection of trade-routes leading either to the east or to the west.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.27

tatrāpi cakrapādapathayoś cakrapatho vipulārambhatvāt śreyān, deśakālasambhāvano vā kharoṣṭrapathaḥ //

Of a cart-track and a foot-path, a cart-track is better as it affords facilities for preparations on a large scale.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

Routes that can be traversed by asses or camels, irrespective of countries and seasons are also good.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.28

ābhyām aṃsapatho vyākhyātaḥ //

This explains the selection of trade-routes traversed by men alone (amsa-patha, shoulder-path, i.e., a path traversed by men carrying merchandise on their shoulders).

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.29

parakarmodayo netuḥ kṣayo vṛddhir viparyaye //

It is a loss for the conqueror to undertake that kind of work which is productive of benefits to the enemy, while a work of reverse nature is a gain. When the benefits are equal, the conqueror has to consider that his condition is stagnant.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.30

tulye karmapathe sthānaṃ jñeyaṃ svaṃ vijigīṣuṇā //

7.12.31

alpāgamātivyayatā kṣayo vṛddhir viparyaye //

Likewise it is a loss to undertake a work of less out-put and of a greater outlay, while a work of reverse nature is a gain. If the out-put and outlay of a work are at par, the conqueror has to consider that his condition is stagnant.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.32

samāyavyayatā sthānaṃ karmasu jñeyam ātmanaḥ //

7.12.33

tasmād alpavyayārambhaṃ durgādiṣu mahodayam //

Hence the conqueror should find out such fort-building and other works as, instead of being expensive, are productive of greater profit and power. Such is the nature of agreements for undertaking works.

R. Shamasastry 1915, Kautilya's Arthaśāstra

7.12.34

karma labdhvā viśiṣṭaḥ syād ity uktāḥ karmasaṃdhayaḥ //E

Translations (1)

Commentaries (4)

Discussed in (11)