Manava Dharmashastra 6.36

6.36

"tribhirṛṇaiṛ ̍ṇavāñjāyate yajñena devebhyaḥ prajayā pitṛbhyaḥ svādhyāyenarṣibhyaḥ" iti śrutyanuvādinī smṛtiriyam | "nanu ca 'gṛhī bhūtvā pravrajedathavetarathā brahmacaryādeva pravrajet' iti jābālaśrutiḥ" | ucyate | utpattimātramāśrityoktamudāharati | tatre̱daṃ virudhyate "anutpādya tathā prajāmiti" | "yadyeṣā śrutirasti kiṃtahi" | idamucyate | pratyakṣavidhānādrārhasthyasyeti | pravrajediti—tena tu pravrajitenemāni karmāṇi kartavyānyanayā betikartavyatayetyetannāsti | gṛhasthasya tvagnihotrādīni sāṅgakalāpānyāmnātānītyetadabhiprāyametat | ye tvetāṃ śrutimadṛṣṭvā smārtā eva naiṣṭhikādayaste ca gṛhasthāśrameṇa pratyakṣaśrutividhānena bādhyante | ye ca klīvādyanadhikṛtaviṣayatayā smṛtivākyānāmarthavattāṃ varṇayanti teṣāmabhiprāyaṃ na vidmaḥ | yadi tāvat—"ājyāvekṣaṇāviṣṇukamrādyaṅgāśaktau śrauteṣu nādhikriyate, yatastathāvidhāṅgayuktaṃ karma yaḥ saṃpādayituṃ samarthastaṃ pratyadhikāraśrutīnāmarthavattve jāte na tadasamarthamapi kurvīta"—iti | yadyevaṃ smārteṣvapi naiṣṭhikasya gurvarthamudakumbhādyāharaṇaṃ bhaikṣaparicaraṇam,—pārivrājye'pi 'na dvitīyāmapi rātriṃ grāme vasediti'—kutaḥ paṃgvandhayoḥ smārtakarmakramādhikāraḥ | upanayanaṃ caiṣāmasti liṅgam | tat eṣāṃ vivāhārthaṃ "yadyarthitā tu dārairiti” (6|203) | yadyapyupanayanamādityadarśanamagnipradakṣiṇaṃ parītyeti ca vihitam, yato nānupanītasya vivāhasambhavo vrātyatvāt, ato yāvacchakyaṃ guruśuśrūṣaṇaṃ viguṇamapi brahmacaryamevamasti | klībasya tu prakṛteranupaneyataiva | sa ca patitaśca na kvacidadhikṛtaḥ | tasmādanadhikṛtaviṣayaṃ pārivrājyaṃ naiṣṭhikatā ceti na manaḥ paritoṣamādadhāti | satyaṃ uditahomanindāvadbhaviṣyati | samuccayapakṣamāśritya 'anapākṛtyeti' nindāvacanam, na punaḥ pratiṣedha eva | athavā yadā'kṛtadāraparigrahasya pravrajyāyāmadhikāra ityevametanneyam |

Medhātithi’s commentary (manubhāṣya):
This Smṛti-text reiterates what has been said in the following Śruti—‘Man is born beset with three debts—the debt of sacrifice to the gods, the debt of offspring to the Pitṛs, and the debt of vedic study to the sages’ (Śatapatha-Brāhmaṇa, 1.7.2.1).

“But the Jābāla-śruti has declared that—‘one should go forth as a mendicant after having been a house-holder, or he may go forth directly after studentship’."

Our explanation of this is as follows:—What the text just quoted does is to mention the mere coming into existence of the stage of Renunciation; and if it were taken in its literal sense it would be contrary to what is said in the following verse regarding the impropriety of ‘going forth, without having begotten offspring’.

“Well, when we have the Śruti just quoted, what if it be contrary to a Smṛti- text?”

We explain. The necessity of taking to the Householder’s life has been directly enjoined (with all its details); while all that the text does in regard to the Renunciate is to enjoin that ‘one shall go forth’; and nothing is said as to the rites to be performed by the Renunciate, or the procedure to be adopted in regard to those rites. As regards the Householder on the other hand, the Agnihotra and other rites have been prescribed along with nil their appurtenant details. This is what we meant (by urging that the Śruti text quoted, if taken in its literal sense, would be contrary to the Smṛti- text). Those persons then who, not knowing of the Śruti text describing the‘three debts’, take their stand upon Smṛti -texts only, and become life-long ‘students’, find themselves running up against the ‘Householder’s Life’ which has been directly enjoined.

There are some people who explain the Smṛti-texts relating to the ‘Life-long Student’ as applying to the case of such men as are suffering from impotence or some such debility, and are, on that account, not entitled to entering upon the House holder’s Life.

But we do not understand what these people really mean. Their meaning may be as follows:—Such a person is not entitled to the rites laid down in the Śruti, on account of their being incapable of properly accomplishing such acts as the ex amining of the clarified butter (which cannot be done by the blind), or the walk in Viṣṇu’s steps (which cannot be done by the lame); and that even so the said Śruti-texts have their application in the case of such men as are capable of duly accomplishing the rites with all the said details; so that there is no need for taking them as forcing the disabled persona also to perform the acts”.

If this is what is meant, then as regards the Smṛti -texts also which speak of the ‘Life-long student’,—such a student also would have to ‘fetch water for the Teacher,’ to beg for food, and so forth; and in regard to the Renunciate also it has been declared that ‘he shall not dwell in any one place for a second night’. So that how could the blind and lame be entitled to these life-stages as prescribed by the Smṛti -texts? In fact the Initiatory Ceremony (upanayana) itself is clearly indicative of all (the four life-stages). Hence the desire of the person for marriage, which is referred to later on (9.203) in the text—‘if he has need for a wife etc. &c.’ Though in connection with the Initiatory Ceremony also, there are several details, such as looking at the sun, going round the fire, and so forth (which cannot be done by the blind or the lame), yet—in as much as the uninitiated person, by reason of his having become an outcast, would not be entitled to marry,—it is open to the man to keep up bis studentship, even though defective, by serving his Teacher to the best of his ability. As for the impotent man, he is, by his very nature, unfit for the Initiatory Ceremony; in fact, like the outcast, he is not entitled to anything at all.

From all this our mind is not satisfied with the view that the life of the Renunciate (directly after studentship), or that of the Life-long Student, is meant for disabled people. In fact the two methods may well be regarded as optional alternatives; as is done in the case of the two Vedic texts laying down oblations to be offend ‘before sunrise’ and ‘after sunrise’. And it is in accordance. with the alternative view that nil the four life-stages should be passed through that we have the passage—‘without paying off his debts &c.’,—which is deprecatory and not prohibitive (of Life-long Studentship, or Direct Renunciation). Or, it may be taken as referring to cases where the married man is going to take to Renunciation.—(36).