Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad ("Great Forest Teaching") 1.4
Bṛhadāraṇyakopaniṣad 1.4
- Language
- Sanskrit
Contents
- 1.4.17 — 1 part
1.4.1
ātmaivedamagra āsītpuruṣavidhaḥ so'nuvīkṣya nānyadātmano'paśyatso'hamasmītyagre vyāharattato'haṃnāmābhavattasmādapyetarhyāmantrito'hamayamityevāgra uktvāthānyannāma prabrūte yadasya bhavati sa yatpūrvo'smātsarvasmātsarvānpāpmana auṣattasmātpuruṣa oṣati ha vai sa taṃ yo'smātpūrvo bubhūṣati ya evaṃ veda
In the beginning this was Self alone, in the shape of a person (purusha). He looking round saw nothing but his Self. He first said, 'This is I;' therefore he became I by name. Therefore even now, if a man is asked, he first says, 'This is I,' and then pronounces the other name which he may have. And because before (pûrva) all this, he (the Self) burnt down (ush) all evils, therefore he was a person (pur-usha). Verily he who knows this, burns down every one who tries to be before him.
1.4.2
so'bibhettasmādekākī bibheti sa hāyamīkṣāṃ cakre yanmadanyannāsti kasmānnu bibhemīti tata evāsya bhayaṃ vīyāya kasmāddhyabheṣyaddvitīyādvai bhayaṃ bhavati
He feared, and therefore any one who is lonely fears. He thought, 'As there is nothing but myself, why should I fear?' Thence his fear passed away. For what should he have feared? Verily fear arises from a second only.
1.4.3
sa vai naiva reme tasmādekākī na ramate sa dvitīyamaicchat | sahaitāvānāsa yathā strīpumām̐sau saṃpariṣvaktau sa imamevātmānaṃ dvedhāpātayattataḥ patiśca patnī cābhavatāṃ tasmādidamardhabṛgalamiva sva iti ha smāha yājñavalkyastasmādayamākāśaḥ striyā pūryata eva tām̐ samabhavattato manuṣyā ajāyanta
But he felt no delight. Therefore a man who is lonely feels no delight. He wished for a second. He was so large as man and wife together. He then made this his Self to fall in two (pat), and thence arose husband (pati) and wife (patnî). Therefore Yâgñavalkya said: 'We two are thus (each of us) like half a shell.' Therefore the void which was there, is filled by the wife. He embraced her, and men were born.
1.4.4
sā heyamīkṣāṃ cakre kathaṃ nu mātmana eva janayitvā saṃbhavati hanta tiro'sānīti sā gaurabhavadṛṣabha itarastām̐ samevābhavattato gāvo'jāyanta vaḍavetarābhavadaśvavṛṣa itaro gardabhītarā gardabha itarastām̐ samevābhavattata ekaśaphamajāyatājetarābhavadvasta itaro'viritarā meṣa itarastām̐ samevābhavattato'jāvayo'jāyantaivameva yadidaṃ kiṃca mithunamā pipīlikābhyastatsarvamasṛjata
She thought, 'How can he embrace me, after having produced me from himself? I shall hide myself.'
She then became a cow, the other became a bull and embraced her, and hence cows were born. The one became a mare, the other a stallion; the one a male ass, the other a female ass. He embraced her, and hence one-hoofed animals were born. The one became a she-goat, the other a he-goat; the one became a ewe, the other a ram. He embraced her, and hence goats and sheep were born. And thus he created everything that exists in pairs, down to the ants.
1.4.5
so'vedahaṃ vāva sṛṣṭirasmyaham̐ hīdam̐ sarvamasṛkṣīti tataḥ sṛṣṭirabhavatsṛṣṭyām̐ hāsyaitasyāṃ bhavati ya evaṃ veda
He knew, 'I indeed am this creation, for I created all this.' Hence he became the creation, and he who knows this lives in this his creation.
1.4.6
athetyabhyamanthatsa mukhācca yonerhastābhyāṃ cāgnimasṛjata tasmādetadubhayamalomakamantarato'lomakā hi yonirantarataḥ | tadyadidamāhuramuṃ yajāmuṃ yajetyekaikaṃ devametasyaiva sā visṛṣṭireṣa u hyeva sarve devāḥ | atha yatkiṃcedamārdraṃ tadretaso'sṛjata tadu soma etāvadvā idam̐ sarvamannaṃ caivānnādaśca soma evānnamagnirannādaḥ saiṣā brahmaṇo'tisṛṣṭiryacchreyaso devānasṛjatātha yanmartyaḥ sannamṛtānasṛjata tasmādatisṛṣṭiratisṛṣṭyām̐ hāsyaitasyāṃ bhavati ya evaṃ veda
Next he thus produced fire by rubbing. From the mouth, as from the fire-hole, and from the hands he created fire. Therefore both the mouth and the hands are inside without hair, for the fire-hole is inside without hair.
And when they say, 'Sacrifice to this or sacrifice to that god,' each god is but his manifestation, for he is all gods.
Now, whatever there is moist, that he created from seed; this is Soma. So far verily is this universe either food or eater. Soma indeed is food, Agni eater. This is the highest creation of Brahman, when he created the gods from his better part, and when he, who was (then) mortal, created the immortals. Therefore it was the highest creation. And he who knows this, lives in this his highest creation.
1.4.7
taddhedaṃ tarhyavyākṛtamāsīttannāmarūpābhyāmeva vyākriyatāsau nāmāyamidam̐ rūpa iti tadidamapyetarhi nāmarūpābhyāmeva vyākriyate'saunāmāyamidam̐rūpa iti sa eṣa iha praviṣṭaḥ ā nakhāgrebhyo yathā kṣuraḥ kṣuradhāne'vahitaḥ syādviśvaṃbharo vā viśvaṃbharakulāye taṃ na paśyanti | akṛtsno hi saḥ prāṇanneva prāṇo nāma bhavati | vadanvāk paśyam̐ścakṣuḥ śṛṇvanśrotraṃ manvāno manastānyasyaitāni karmanāmānyeva | sa yo'ta ekaikamupāste na sa vedākṛtsno hyeṣo'ta ekaikena bhavatyātmetyevopāsītātra hyete sarva ekaṃ bhavanti | tadetatpadanīyamasya sarvasya yadayamātmānena hyetatsarvaṃ veda yathā ha vai padenānuvindedevaṃ kīrtim̐ ślokaṃ vindate ya evaṃ veda
Now all this was then undeveloped. It became developed by form and name, so that one could say, 'He, called so and so, is such a one.' Therefore at present also all this is developed by name and form, so that one can say, 'He, called so and so, is such a one.'
He (Brahman or the Self) entered thither, to the very tips of the finger-nails, as a razor might be fitted in a razor-case, or as fire in a fire-place.
He cannot be seen, for, in part only, when breathing, he is breath by name; when speaking, speech by name; when seeing, eye by name; when hearing, ear by name; when thinking, mind by name. All these are but the names of his acts. And he who worships (regards) him as the one or the other, does not know him, for he is apart from this (when qualified) by the one or the other (predicate). Let men worship him as Self, for in the Self all these are one. This Self is the footstep of everything, for through it one knows everything. And as one can find again by footsteps what was lost, thus he who knows this finds glory and praise.
1.4.8
tadetatpreyaḥ putrātpreyo vittātpreyo'nyasmātsarvasmādantarataraṃ yadayamātmā | sa yo'nyamātmanaḥ priyaṃ bruvāṇaṃ brūyāt priyam̐ rotsyatītīśvaro ha tathaiva syādātmānameva priyamupāsīta sa ya ātmānameva priyamupāste na hāsya priyaṃ pramāyukaṃ bhavati
This, which is nearer to us than anything, this Self, is dearer than a son, dearer than wealth, dearer than all else.
And if one were to say to one who declares another than the Self dear, that he will lose what is dear to him, very likely it would be so. Let him worship the Self alone as dear. He who worships the Self alone as dear, the object of his love will never perish.
1.4.9
tadāhuryabrahmavidyayā sarvaṃ bhaviṣyanto manuṣyā manyante kimu tadbrahmāvedyasmāttatsarvamabhavaditi
Here they say: 'If men think that by knowledge of Brahman they will become everything, what then did that Brahman know, from whence all this sprang?'
1.4.10
brahma vā idamagra āsīttadātmānamevāvedahaṃ brahmāsmīti tasmāttatsarvamabhavattadyo yo devānāṃ pratyabudhyata sa eva tadabhavattatharṣīṇāṃ tathā manuṣyāṇāṃ taddhaitatpaśyannṛṣirvāmadevaḥ pratipede'haṃ manurabhavam̐ sūryaśceti | tadidamapyetarhi ya evaṃ vedāhaṃ brahmāsmīti sa idam̐ sarvaṃ bhavati tasya ha na devāścanābhūtyā īśate | ātmā hyeṣām̐ sa bhavatyatha yo'nyāṃ devatāmupāste'nyo'sāvanyo'hamasmīti na sa veda yathā paśurevam̐ sa devānām | yathā ha vai bahavaḥpaśavo manuṣyaṃ bhuñjyurevamekaikaḥ puruṣo devānbhunaktyekasminneva paśāvādīyamāne'priyaṃ bhavati kimu bahuṣu tasmādeṣāṃ tanna priyaṃ yadetanmanuṣyā vidyuḥ
Verily in the beginning this was Brahman, that Brahman knew (its) Self only, saying, 'I am Brahman.' From it all this sprang. Thus, whatever Deva was awakened (so as to know Brahman), he indeed became that (Brahman); and the same with Rishis and men. The Rishi Vâmadeva saw and understood it, singing, 'I was Manu (moon), I was the sun.' Therefore now also he who thus knows that he is Brahman, becomes all this, and even the Devas cannot prevent it, for he himself is their Self.
Now if a man worships another deity, thinking the deity is one and he another, he does not know. He is like a beast for the Devas. For verily, as many beasts nourish a man, thus does every man nourish the Devas. If only one beast is taken away, it is not pleasant; how much more when many are taken! Therefore it is not pleasant to the Devas that men should know this.
1.4.11
brahma vā idamagra āsīdekameva tadekam̐ sanna vyabhavat | tacchreyorūpamatyasṛjata kṣatraṃ yānyetāni devatrā kṣatrāṇīndro varuṇaḥ somo rudraḥ parjanyo yamo mṛtyurīśāna iti tasmātkṣatrātparaṃ nāsti tasmādbrāhmaṇaḥ kṣatriyamadhastādupāste rājasūye kṣatra eva tadyaśo dadhāti saiṣā kṣatrasya yoniryadbrahma | tasmādyadyapi rājā paramatāṃ gacchati brahmaivāntata upaniśrayati svāṃ yoniṃ ya u enam̐ hinasti svām̐ sa yonimṛcchati sa pāpīyān bhavati yathā śreyām̐sam̐ him̐sitvā
Verily in the beginning this was Brahman, one only. That being one, was not strong enough. It created still further the most excellent Kshatra (power), viz. those Kshatras (powers) among the Devas,--Indra, Varuna, Soma, Rudra, Parganya, Yama, Mrityu, Îsâna. Therefore there is nothing beyond the Kshatra, and therefore at the Râgasûya sacrifice the Brâhmana sits down below the Kshatriya. He confers that glory on the Kshatra alone. But Brahman is (nevertheless) the birth-place of the Kshatra. Therefore though a king is exalted, he sits down at the end (of the sacrifice) below the Brahman, as his birth-place. He who injures him, injures his own birth-place. He becomes worse, because he has injured one better than himself.
1.4.12
sa naiva vyabhavatsa viśamasṛjata yānyetāni devajātāni gaṇaśa ākhyāyante vasavo rudrā ādityā viśvedevā maruta iti
He was not strong enough. He created the Vis (people), the classes of Devas which in their different orders are called Vasus, Rudras, Âdityas, Visve Devas, Maruts.
1.4.13
sa naiva vyabhavatsa śaudraṃ varṇamasṛjata pūṣaṇamiyaṃ vai pūṣeyam̐ hīdam̐ sarvaṃ puṣyati yadidaṃ kiṃca
He was not strong enough. He created the Sûdra colour (caste), as Pûshan (as nourisher). This earth verily is Pûshan (the nourisher); for the earth nourishes all this whatsoever.
1.4.14
sa naiva vyabhavattacchreyorūpamatyasṛjata dharmaṃ tadetatkṣatrasya kṣatraṃ yaddharmastasmāddharmātparaṃ nāstyatho abalīyānbalīyām̐samāśam̐sate dharmeṇa yathā rājñaivaṃ yo vai sa dharmaḥ satyaṃ vai tattasmātsatyaṃ vadantamāhurdharmaṃ vadatīti dharmaṃ vā vadantam̐ satyaṃ vadatītyetaddhyevaitadubhayaṃ bhavati
He was not strong enough. He created still further the most excellent Law (dharma). Law is the Kshatra (power) of the Kshatra, therefore there is nothing higher than the Law. Thenceforth even a weak man rules a stronger with the help of the Law, as with the help of a king. Thus the Law is what is called the true. And if a man declares what is true, they say he declares the Law; and if he declares the Law, they say he declares what is true. Thus both are the same.
1.4.15
tadetadbrahma kṣatraṃ viṭ śūdrastadagninaiva deveṣu brahmābhavadbrāhmaṇo manuṣyeṣu kṣatriyeṇa kṣatriyo vaiśyena vaiśyaḥ śūdreṇa śūdrastasmādagnāveva deveṣu lokamicchante brāhmaṇe manuṣyeṣvetābhyām̐ hi rūpābhyāṃ brahmābhavat | atha yo ha vā asmāllokātsvaṃ lokamadṛṣṭvā praiti sa enamavidito na bhunakti yathā vedo vānanūkto'nyadvā karmākṛtaṃ yadiha vā apyanevaṃvinmahatpuṇyaṃ karma karoti taddhāsyāntataḥ kṣīyata evātmānameva lokamupāsīta sa ya ātmānameva lokamupāste na hāsya karma kṣīyate asmāddhyevātmano yadyatkāmayate tattatsṛjate
There are then this Brahman, Kshatra, Vis, and Sûdra. Among the Devas that Brahman existed as Agni (fire) only, among men as Brâhmana, as Kshatriya through the (divine) Kshatriya, as Vaisya through the (divine) Vaisya, as Sûdra through the (divine) Sûdra. Therefore people wish for their future state among the Devas through Agni (the sacrificial fire) only; and among men through the Brâhmana, for in these two forms did Brahman exist.
Now if a man departs this life without having seen his true future life (in the Self), then that Self, not being known, does not receive and bless him, as if the Veda had not been read, or as if a good work had not been done. Nay, even if one who does not know that (Self), should perform here on earth some great holy work, it will Perish for him in the end. Let a man worship the Self only as his true state. If a man worships the Self only as his true state, his work does not Perish, for whatever he desires that he gets from that Self.
1.4.16
atho ayaṃ vā ātmā sarveṣāṃ bhūtānāṃ lokaḥ sa yajjuhoti yadyajate tena devānāṃ loko'tha yadanubrūte tena ṛṣīṇāmatha yatpitṛbhyo nipṛṇāti yatprajāmicchate tena pitṝṇāmatha yanmanuṣyānvāsayate yadebhyo'śanaṃ dadāti tena manuṣyāṇāmatha yatpaśubhyastṛṇodakaṃ vindati tena paśūnāṃ yadasya gṛheṣu śvāpadāvayām̐syā pipīlikābhya upajīvanti tena teṣāṃ loko yathā ha vai svāya lokāyāriṣṭimicchedevam̐ haivaṃvide sarvāṇi bhūtānyariṣṭimicchanti tadvā etadviditaṃ mīmām̐sitam
Now verily this Self (of the ignorant man) is the world of all creatures. In so far as man sacrifices and pours out libations, he is the world of the Devas; in so far as he repeats the hymns, &c., he is the world of the Rishis; in so far as he offers cakes to the Fathers and tries to obtain offspring, he is the world of the Fathers; in so far as he gives shelter and food to men, he is the world of men; in so far as he finds fodder and water for the animals, he is the world of the animals; in so far as quadrupeds, birds, and even ants live in his houses, he is their world. And as every one wishes his own world not to be injured, thus all beings wish that he who knows this should not be injured. Verily this is known and has been well reasoned.
1.4.17
ātmaivedamagra āsīdeka eva so'kāmayata jāyā me syādatha prajāyeyātha vittaṃ me syādatha karma kurvīyetyetāvānvai kāmo neccham̐ścanāto bhūyo vindettasmādapyetarhyekākī kāmayate jāyā me syādatha prajāyeyātha vittaṃ me syādatha karma kurvīyeti sa yāvadapyeteṣāmekaikaṃ na prāpnotyakṛtsra eva tāvanmanyate tasyo kṛtsnatā mana evāsyātmā vāgjāyā prāṇaḥ prajā cakṣurmānuṣaṃ vittaṃ cakṣuṣā hi tadvindate śrotraṃ daivam̐ śrotreṇa hi tacchṛṇotyātmaivāsya karmātmanā hi karma karoti sa eṣa pāṅkto yajñaḥ pāṅktaḥ paśuḥ pāṅktaḥ puruṣaḥ pāṅktamidam̐ sarvaṃ yadidaṃ kiṃca tadidam̐ sarvamāpnoti ya evaṃ veda
In the beginning this was Self alone, one only. He desired, 'Let there be a wife for me that I may have offspring, and let there be wealth for me that I may offer sacrifices.' Verily this is the whole desire, and, even if wishing for more, he would not find it. Therefore now also a lonely person desires, 'Let there be a wife for me that I may have offspring, and let there be wealth for me that I may offer sacrifices.' And so long as he does not obtain either of these things, he thinks he is incomplete. Now his completeness (is made up as follows): mind is his self (husband); speech the wife; breath the child; the eye all worldly wealth, for he finds it with the eye; the ear his divine wealth, for he hears it with the ear. The body (âtman) is his work, for with the body he works. This is the fivefold sacrifice, for fivefold is the animal, fivefold man, fivefold all this whatsoever. He who knows this, obtains all this.
1.4.17.p1
iti prathamādhyāye caturthaṃ brāhmaṇam
Translations (1)
- The Upanishads, Part II (SBE 15) — Friedrich Max Müller 1884, English
Commentaries (7)
- Bṛhadāraṇyakopaniṣadbhāṣya — Śaṅkara, Sanskrit
- Padapāṭha (sandhi-resolved text, TITUS) — Sanskrit
- Bṛhadāraṇyakaprakāśikā (Raṅgarāmānuja) — Raṅgarāmānuja Muni 1500, Sanskrit
- Bṛhadāraṇyakabhāṣya (Madhva) — Madhva, Sanskrit
- Commentary of Upaniṣadbrahmayogin — Upaniṣadbrahmayogin 1700, Sanskrit
- Khaṇḍārtha — Rāghavendra Tīrtha 1615, Sanskrit
- Mitākṣarā — Nityānanda Āśrama 1820, Sanskrit
Linked texts (43)
- Īśādiviṃśottaraśatopaniṣadaḥ — Sanskrit
- The Philosophy of the Upanishads — Paul Deussen & A. S. Geden, English
- Original Sanskrit Texts on the Origin and History of the People of India, their Religion and Institutions — John Muir, English
- Indian Philosophy — S. Radhakrishnan, English
- The Religion and Philosophy of the Veda and Upanishads — Arthur Berriedale Keith, English
- A Constructive Survey of Upanishadic Philosophy — R. D. Ranade, English
- Spiritual Authority and Temporal Power in the Indian Theory of Government — Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, English
- History of Dharmaśāstra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) — P. V. Kane, English
- Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge — K. N. Jayatilleke, English
- The Religions of India — Edward Washburn Hopkins, English
- Vedic Index of Names and Subjects — Arthur A. Macdonell & A. Berriedale Keith, English
- Studies in the Origins of Buddhism — Govind Chandra Pande, English
- Obscure Religious Cults as Background of Bengali Literature — Surendranath Dasgupta, English
- Ancient Indian Education (Brahmanical and Buddhist) — Radhakumud Mookerji, English
- The System of the Vedânta according to Bâdarâyana's Brahma-Sûtras and Çankara's Commentary — Paul Deussen & Charles Johnston, English
- Outlines of Indian Philosophy — M. Hiriyanna, English
- Elements of Buddhist Iconography — Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, English
- The Hindu Temple — Stella Kramrisch, English
- Social and Rural Economy of Northern India, cir. 600 B.C.–200 A.D. — Atindranath Bose, English
- Śūdras in Ancient India: A Social History of the Lower Order down to circa A.D. 600 — R. S. Sharma, English
- State and Government in Ancient India — A. S. Altekar, English
- Vaiṣṇavism, Śaivism and Minor Religious Systems — R. G. Bhandarkar, English
- Buddhist Philosophy in India and Ceylon — Arthur Berriedale Keith, English
- The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society — J. C. Heesterman, English
- A History of Hindu Political Theories from the Earliest Times to the End of the First Quarter of the Seventeenth Century A.D. — U. N. Ghoshal, English
- The Sāṃkhya System: A History of the Sāṃkhya Philosophy — Arthur Berriedale Keith, English
- The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies — Karl H. Potter, English
- The History and Culture of the Indian People — R. C. Majumdar & A. D. Pusalker, English
- A History of Indian Philosophy — Surendranath Dasgupta, English
- Bṛhadāraṇyakopaniṣadbhāṣyavārttikasāra — Mādhava, Sanskrit
- Hinduism and Buddhism: An Historical Sketch — Charles Eliot, English
- Political History of Ancient India, from the Accession of Parikshit to the Extinction of the Gupta Dynasty — Hemchandra Raychaudhuri, English
- Vāda in Theory and Practice: Studies in Debates, Dialogues and Discussions in Indian Intellectual Discourses — Radhavallabh Tripathi, English
- Gorakhnāth and the Kānphaṭa Yogīs — George Weston Briggs, English
- Die Kosmographie der Inder nach den Quellen dargestellt — Willibald Kirfel, German
- A History of Pāli Literature — Bimala Churn Law, English
- Studies in the Purāṇic Records on Hindu Rites and Customs — R. C. Hazra, English
- Saṃnyāsa Upaniṣads: Hindu Scriptures on Asceticism and Renunciation — Patrick Olivelle, English
- Corporate Life in Ancient India — R. C. Majumdar, English
- The History of Buddhist Thought — Edward J. Thomas, English
- Buddhist India — T. W. Rhys Davids, English
- Public Administration in Ancient India — Pramathanath Banerjea, English
- Local Government in Ancient India — Radhakumud Mookerji, English