Praudhamanorama p120

p120

[On] *pumaḥ khayyampare* (Pā. Sū. 8.3.6): This is an imitation of the remaining part [of *pums*] after the elision of the consonant ending in a conjunct consonant (*saṃyogāntalopa*) has been made. On "because of exclusion (*paryudāsa*)": In the rule enjoining *ṣatva*, namely *idudupadhasya…* (Pā. Sū. 8.3.41)—such is the idea. This is according to the view of the older grammarians who explain it as an appositional difference (*vaiyadhikaraṇya*): "the *visarga* which does not belong to an affix". But if the connection is made through appositional agreement (*sāmānādhikaraṇya*) according to the manner to be stated later, it should be understood as: "when there is the contingency of *ṣatva*".