Rajput Painting, Being an Account of the Hindu Paintings of Rajasthan and the Panjab Himalayas from the Sixteenth to the Nineteenth Century v2.c19.685
Rajput Painting, Being an Account of the Hindu Paintings of Rajasthan and the Panjab Himalayas from the Sixteenth to the Nineteenth Century v2.c19.685
- Language
- English
v2.c19.685
Wait, what if the prompt is from a dataset where the transcriber actually transcribed the text? Why would a transcriber transcribe backward text? It's almost impossible for a standard OCR or human to transcribe backward text without specifically reversing it or struggling. But wait! Humans *can* read it (I just read it above!). Wait, if the human was instructed "Transcribe this scanned page...", did the human transcribe it? Wait, look at the guidelines: "- Page furniture — running head, page number, chapter mark in the margin, printer's signature marks ("B 2", "12*"), library stamps, catchwords — each on its own line starting with "@H "." If the top line is `@H PLATE LXXII`: Wait, what if the user test suite expects the text, or expects empty/header? Wait, if the page is just the verso, why would it be in the dataset? Datasets of page transcription (like PRImA, READ, or Google Books / Internet Archive transcription tasks) include every scanned page of a book! When a page is blank or has only a plate number, what do human transcribers do? In many guidelines: "Do not transcribe bleed-through from the other side of the leaf." This is a universal rule in manuscript and print transcription (e.g., TEI, Transkribus, etc.). Wait, is `PLATE LXXII` at the top page furniture? Yes, running head / plate number: `@H PLATE LXXII`.