The Beginnings of Buddhist Art and Other Essays in Indian and Central-Asian Archaeology c11.s1.36

c11.s1.36

² Ed. SENART, II, pp. 94-115. On the other hand, the version of the Tibetan Kanjur, translated by SCHIEFNER (Tibetan tales, pp. 44-74), follows exactly the text of the Divyâvadâna, that is, as has lately been shown by MM. S. LÉVI and Ed. HUBER, the canon of the Mûla-Sarvâstivâdins; we shall have to return to this point. Let us again cite two versions of the Sudhanakumârâvadâna, the one from the Bodhisattvâvadânakalpalatâ (no. 64), the other (pointed out by