Defence Architecture in Early North Karnataka c11.s2.t1.6

c11.s2.t1.6

These two differences clearly indicate that the retaining wall exposed in section was concealed originally, while making provision for the door jamb at the centre. But in the recent times when the entrance was widened, unfortunately the jamb and the coping material had been scraped off, while in the opposite section (Fig.14) the door jamb is still in its original position. Although the finished surface on the sides had been seriously affected but not to the extent of exposing the retaining walls in the core in alignment with those of the opposite section.