Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

The Script of Harappa and Mohenjodaro and its Connection with Other Scripts c10.s1.14

The Script of Harappa and Mohenjodaro and its Connection with Other Scripts c10.s1.14

Language
English

c10.s1.14

(2) That 𝍖 is a suffixed element in name-formation is strongly suggested by a comparison of Tables I and LXVIII. It will be seen that 𝍘 like 𝍖 is normally final. Like 𝍖, if followed by any single sign, it is followed by 𝍙, 𝍚. Like 𝍖 it is preceded by well defined sign-groups that clearly constitute words. But, the three distinguishable words that precede 𝍘, viz., 𝍛, 𝍜, 𝍝, 𝍞, occurring as they do 26 times are never once found preceding 𝍖, while of all the many sign-groups found regularly preceding 𝍖 not one is found preceding ⌂. Are we to assume that all the men whose names ended in, say., Enlil, Nannar, -mansum, were leather workers, and all other men whatsoever were scribes? For that is the position to which we are reduced if we insist on regarding ⌙ and ⌂ as determinatives.