The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c8.s12.95

c8.s12.95

⁶ There are, however, two spurious grants. One is the grant from Pimpalnêr in the Khândêsh District (*Ind. Ant.* Vol. IX. p. 293), which refers itself to the time of Satyâśraya, and purports to be dated in *Saka-Samvat* 310 (expired), = A. D. 388-89, and to record that he bestowed the village of Pippalanagara upon Brahmans: here, the name Satyâśraya might possibly be intended to denote Pulikêśin II.; but it probably indicates the grandfather, Pulikêśin I. The other is the British Museum grant, obtained from somewhere in the Southern Marâṭhâ Country or in the Kanarese country (*id.*, Vol. VII. p. 209), which distinctly refers itself to his time, and purports to be dated in the *Vibhava samvatsara*, coupled with *Saka-Samvat* 411 expired by mistake for 410 expired or 411 current, = A. D. 488-89, and to record the building of a Jain temple, and the allotment of certain grants to it, at the village of Alaktakanagarî, in the Kuhuṇḍi *vishaya*, which was being governed by a feudatory named Sâmiyâra, of the Ruṇḍanîla-Saindraka family.