The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c8.s14.167

c8.s14.167

¹ The only record of the Parâbhava saṁvatsara, known to me, which is any way connected with this question, does not refer itself to either reign (see Ind. Ant. Vol. XXII. p. 297). There is an inscription of later date, at Kyâsanûr in the Dhârwâr District, which, belonging really to the seventh year of Sômêśvara III., nevertheless represents Vikramâditya VI. as still reigning, and is dated in his fifty-eighth year by mistake for the fifty-seventh, the Paridhâvin saṁvatsara, in the month Chaitra falling in A.D. 1132. And there may be similar records elsewhere, of A.D. 1127, 1129, and 1132-33 (see Ind. Ant. Vol. XXII. p.298). But they are, in reality, instances of an attempt that was made to continue, after the end of his reign, the use of the new era which was established by him (see note 4, below).