The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c8.s15.128

c8.s15.128

² The following instances are reliable:—(1) An inscription in a Jain temple at Lakkundi in the Dhârwâr District (Carn.-Désa Inscrs. Vol. II. p. 153; verified from an ink-impression), is dated in Pausha of the Nandana samvatsara (Saka-Samvat 1095 current) which is cited as his sixth year. (2) An inscription at a temple of Basavanna at Yêûr, in the Nizâm's Dominions (Carn.-Désa Inscrs. Vol. II. p. 170; verified from an ink-impression), is dated in Kârttika of the Vijaya samvatsara, (S.-S. 1096 current), which is cited as his seventh year. (3) An inscription at Narsâpur, in either the Gadag or the Koḍ tâluka of the same district (P. S. and O.-C. Inscrs. No. 101), is dated in Pausha of the Vijaya samvatsara, which here again is cited as his seventh year. (4) An inscription on a beam in a temple in the fort at Lakkundi (Carn.-Désa Inscrs. Vol. II. p. 179) is dated in Mârgaśirsha of the Jaya samvatsara (S.-S. 1097 current), which is cited as his eighth year. And (5) an inscription at the temple of Gôpâlasvâmin at Chikka-Muddanûr, in the Nizâm's Dominions, which is represented in the Carn.-Désa Inscrs. Vol. II, p. 136, as being dated in his third year, the Virôdhin samvatsara, is in reality dated, as plainly as could possibly be—(I quote from an ink-impression),—in Âśvina of the Manmatha samvatsara, (S.-S. 1098 current), which is cited as his ninth year.