The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c8.s17.171

c8.s17.171

³ The only instances not in agreement with this, that I can quote, are—(1) the Sorab inscription (P. S. and O.-C. Inscrs. No. 225; Mysore Inscriptions, p. 207), which quotes the Svabhânu saṁvatsara (Śaka-Saṁvat 1206 current), = A.D. 1283-84, as his twelfth year. (2) The Raṭṭêhalli inscription (on a pillar in the temple of Kadambêśvara; Carn.-Dêsa Inscrs. Vol. II. p. 529), which appears to quote the Vilambin saṁvatsara (Ś.-S. 1221 current), = A. D. 1298-99, as his twenty-seventh year. These two require that the Âṅgirasa saṁvatsara (Ś.-S. 1195 current), = A. D. 1272-73, should be taken as his first year. And (3) the Kyâsanûr inscription (I quote from an ink-impression) which cites the Nandana saṁvatsara (Ś.-S. 1215 current), = A. D. 1292-93, as his twenty-fourth year. This requires that his first year should be put back to the śukla saṁvatsara, Ś.-S. 1192 current, = A. D. 1269-70; and this conflicts with the latest date for his predecessor Mahâdêva.